<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now In Paper-Vision: The Future of Books. And TV.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/</link>
	<description>News and reviews from the world of gadgets, gear, apps and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: smather2175</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smather2175]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, the first link is broken. &lt;a href=&quot;http://steven-mather.com/downloads/tfopv3.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Future of Publishing, an Industry Study.&lt;/a&gt; That link should work]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the first link is broken. <a href="http://steven-mather.com/downloads/tfopv3.pdf" rel="nofollow">The Future of Publishing, an Industry Study.</a> That link should work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smather2175</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smather2175]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry folks, but your beloved bound book will be an antique in 5-10 years. It makes perfect business sense to eliminate paper, storage, production, etc. when one original can be turned into an infinite number of copies for no cost. Read my study on the future of publishing. It takes it to a new level: &lt;a href=&quot;http://steven-mather/downloads/tfopv3.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Future of Publishing, an Industry Study&lt;/a&gt;.
Future eReaders will be widely accepted by all. It will start in businesses and college. Think about replacing your backpack of textbooks for a handheld reader. Also, the device will mature into more than just eReaders. They will have functionality like color, moving graphics, and things we can&#039;t think of yet. The bound book has 5-10 years.
To the one poster, you still need an editor. No one can possibly edit their own work completely. Maybe you meant publisher. They may die off. The traditional models of the recording industry and publishing industry used to be identical, look at the recording industry now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry folks, but your beloved bound book will be an antique in 5-10 years. It makes perfect business sense to eliminate paper, storage, production, etc. when one original can be turned into an infinite number of copies for no cost. Read my study on the future of publishing. It takes it to a new level: <a href="http://steven-mather/downloads/tfopv3.pdf" rel="nofollow">The Future of Publishing, an Industry Study</a>.<br />
Future eReaders will be widely accepted by all. It will start in businesses and college. Think about replacing your backpack of textbooks for a handheld reader. Also, the device will mature into more than just eReaders. They will have functionality like color, moving graphics, and things we can&#8217;t think of yet. The bound book has 5-10 years.<br />
To the one poster, you still need an editor. No one can possibly edit their own work completely. Maybe you meant publisher. They may die off. The traditional models of the recording industry and publishing industry used to be identical, look at the recording industry now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brew</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the articles aren&#039;t exactly on point but your article on the future of books is much more thought-provoking than the NYT&#039;s on self-publishing. It must be nearly impossible to do, but has anyone ever discussed the statistical data on how many of these self-published/blogs/fan fiction get picked up, sign, and published by a &quot;real&quot; press? 

My favorite potter pals is still &quot;the mysterious ticking noise one.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the articles aren&#8217;t exactly on point but your article on the future of books is much more thought-provoking than the NYT&#8217;s on self-publishing. It must be nearly impossible to do, but has anyone ever discussed the statistical data on how many of these self-published/blogs/fan fiction get picked up, sign, and published by a &#8220;real&#8221; press? </p>
<p>My favorite potter pals is still &#8220;the mysterious ticking noise one.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tereglith</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tereglith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How&#039;d they make Ron&#039;s tiny leather jacket?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;d they make Ron&#8217;s tiny leather jacket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rorschach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to remember though, Meredith, that it will be different for people that are younger, growing up with it.  I&#039;ll never stop reading physical books, but my parents never got into text messaging.  

I don&#039;t think the problem will be book readers switching over to the new thing anytime soon, but with kids growing up with the new thing.  For that reason I think books won&#039;t be dead for a couple more generations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to remember though, Meredith, that it will be different for people that are younger, growing up with it.  I&#8217;ll never stop reading physical books, but my parents never got into text messaging.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the problem will be book readers switching over to the new thing anytime soon, but with kids growing up with the new thing.  For that reason I think books won&#8217;t be dead for a couple more generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meredith81</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meredith81]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still just don&#039;t believe that traditional paper novels are as doomed as everyone thinks.  So far, none of the electronic options are pleasant to read on for long periods of time and listening to a book (for me) defeats the entire purpose of reading (also my attention wanders).  I&#039;m fairly confident that I&#039;m not in a minority by thinking this way.  People in general are slow to adapt new technologies. 

Also, I just love books.  Even if I&#039;m never going to read a book again, once I buy it I have a very hard time getting rid of it.  Part of the reading experience is holding the book in my hand, looking at the cover artwork, checking the business on the back of the title page, and often flipping back to a previous page or chapter to double check something.  I don&#039;t know if that works with electronic media or not.  I don&#039;t care.  There&#039;s a feeling of anticipation that comes from getting a new book, either bought or borrowed, and physically having it in my hands before I start to read.  This goes double for previously read and much loved books.

So, yeah, I&#039;m a huge geek about books and somewhat compulsive about actually owning and keeping them, but I still think there are enough other people who like things the way they are that the industry&#039;s not finished yet.  Maybe I&#039;m just stubborn.  If I am, and I&#039;m wrong, I&#039;ll be disappointed to see books become a laughed-at, old-fashioned technology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still just don&#8217;t believe that traditional paper novels are as doomed as everyone thinks.  So far, none of the electronic options are pleasant to read on for long periods of time and listening to a book (for me) defeats the entire purpose of reading (also my attention wanders).  I&#8217;m fairly confident that I&#8217;m not in a minority by thinking this way.  People in general are slow to adapt new technologies. </p>
<p>Also, I just love books.  Even if I&#8217;m never going to read a book again, once I buy it I have a very hard time getting rid of it.  Part of the reading experience is holding the book in my hand, looking at the cover artwork, checking the business on the back of the title page, and often flipping back to a previous page or chapter to double check something.  I don&#8217;t know if that works with electronic media or not.  I don&#8217;t care.  There&#8217;s a feeling of anticipation that comes from getting a new book, either bought or borrowed, and physically having it in my hands before I start to read.  This goes double for previously read and much loved books.</p>
<p>So, yeah, I&#8217;m a huge geek about books and somewhat compulsive about actually owning and keeping them, but I still think there are enough other people who like things the way they are that the industry&#8217;s not finished yet.  Maybe I&#8217;m just stubborn.  If I am, and I&#8217;m wrong, I&#8217;ll be disappointed to see books become a laughed-at, old-fashioned technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewmcguire</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matthewmcguire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;it stands to reason (at least enough reason for a magazine article, anyway) that we&#039;ll see new literary forms emerge as a result. Alternative electronic forms of publishing -- cell phone novels, self-publishing, POD, Kindle publishing, fan fiction -- are going to rise up and engulf and transform conventional paper publishing. In cool interesting ways.&quot;


That might be true, but there&#039;s no guarantee that people will pay money for these cool, interesting forms of print.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it stands to reason (at least enough reason for a magazine article, anyway) that we&#8217;ll see new literary forms emerge as a result. Alternative electronic forms of publishing &#8212; cell phone novels, self-publishing, POD, Kindle publishing, fan fiction &#8212; are going to rise up and engulf and transform conventional paper publishing. In cool interesting ways.&#8221;</p>
<p>That might be true, but there&#8217;s no guarantee that people will pay money for these cool, interesting forms of print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maytinee369</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maytinee369]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article #2 is exactly what worries me about wanting to join the publishing industry in a couple of years. I keep telling myself everyone needs an editor, but do they really?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article #2 is exactly what worries me about wanting to join the publishing industry in a couple of years. I keep telling myself everyone needs an editor, but do they really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/01/23/now-in-paper-vision-the-future-of-books-and-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Church]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=962#comment-397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the Potter Puppet Pals:
http://www.bobrozak.com/music/pottermusicindex.html
(at the bottom)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Potter Puppet Pals:<br />
<a href="http://www.bobrozak.com/music/pottermusicindex.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bobrozak.com/music/pottermusicindex.html</a><br />
(at the bottom)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

