<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Things That Are Wrong with Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/</link>
	<description>News and reviews from the world of gadgets, gear, apps and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jeroenhoekman</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeroenhoekman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-3847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It all depends on how Twitter is used. For example messages of what you are doing at that moment do not add much value to other peoples lives. Twitter functions so well, because the tweets are of limited length, but it would function much better if also the number of tweets per day would be limited. That way people make sure that the important messages are tweeted and leave out the garbage. See also http://blog.jeroenhoekman.com/will_the_chichat_kill_Twitter.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on how Twitter is used. For example messages of what you are doing at that moment do not add much value to other peoples lives. Twitter functions so well, because the tweets are of limited length, but it would function much better if also the number of tweets per day would be limited. That way people make sure that the important messages are tweeted and leave out the garbage. See also <a href="http://blog.jeroenhoekman.com/will_the_chichat_kill_Twitter.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.jeroenhoekman.com/will_the_chichat_kill_Twitter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hein</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-2454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I&#039;ve got a tottaly different view. Check it out:
 http://xfactorofinnovation2009.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/twitter-abuse-the-trend/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve got a tottaly different view. Check it out:<br />
 <a href="http://xfactorofinnovation2009.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/twitter-abuse-the-trend/" rel="nofollow">http://xfactorofinnovation2009.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/twitter-abuse-the-trend/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostepic</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostepic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@church I think people who have an aversion to Twitter is that it’s a microblog and it tends to lack substance in a short sentence.  While I myself haven’t caught the twitter fire, my response to such critics is that there are plenty of blogs out there about nothing and lack substance.  You can wax eloquent for hours and pages but produce nothing and in a short statement contain the meaning of the world and humanity.  Well maybe that hour of crisis in your life anyway.  So tweet away.  It doesn’t matter what forms of communication are out there, there is always someone who will abuse it or spout off ridiculous notions, whether its graffiti on a wall that “BSG is gay” and youtube videos of you love for Brittney spears people will be out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@church I think people who have an aversion to Twitter is that it’s a microblog and it tends to lack substance in a short sentence.  While I myself haven’t caught the twitter fire, my response to such critics is that there are plenty of blogs out there about nothing and lack substance.  You can wax eloquent for hours and pages but produce nothing and in a short statement contain the meaning of the world and humanity.  Well maybe that hour of crisis in your life anyway.  So tweet away.  It doesn’t matter what forms of communication are out there, there is always someone who will abuse it or spout off ridiculous notions, whether its graffiti on a wall that “BSG is gay” and youtube videos of you love for Brittney spears people will be out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Church]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rorschach: Possibly. I use twitter and hahlo, myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rorschach: Possibly. I use twitter and hahlo, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rorschach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Church: Does it depend on the app?  I&#039;m looking at my Tweetie flow right now and I see plenty of tweets starting with @names that I don&#039;t follow.  
.
Sorry for jacking the thread...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Church: Does it depend on the app?  I&#8217;m looking at my Tweetie flow right now and I see plenty of tweets starting with @names that I don&#8217;t follow.<br />
.<br />
Sorry for jacking the thread&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Church]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rorschach: Not if you lead the post with the @ symbol. 
E.g., If I typed &quot;@gaiusbaltar You are awesome!&quot; then @leverus wouldn&#039;t see it, but you and I would.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rorschach: Not if you lead the post with the @ symbol.<br />
E.g., If I typed &#8220;@gaiusbaltar You are awesome!&#8221; then @leverus wouldn&#8217;t see it, but you and I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rorschach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Church, point 1 isn&#039;t true.  If I have a tweet with an @ in it anyone following me still sees it.  But Lev&#039;s point I disagree with anyway, because with almost any twitter app (maybe even the webpage by now) you can easily navigate to the original tweet if it is a reply, or to the person&#039;s tweets if it isn&#039;t.  Unless someone is twittering &quot;@soandso yes&quot; I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a big problem... people should be RT that stuff anyway for context.  
.
Re Point 3 I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s wrong or not to be concerned about follower numbers... For someone like me it&#039;d be kind of pathetic, but if you are doing it for non-personal reasons then I guess it&#039;d make sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Church, point 1 isn&#8217;t true.  If I have a tweet with an @ in it anyone following me still sees it.  But Lev&#8217;s point I disagree with anyway, because with almost any twitter app (maybe even the webpage by now) you can easily navigate to the original tweet if it is a reply, or to the person&#8217;s tweets if it isn&#8217;t.  Unless someone is twittering &#8220;@soandso yes&#8221; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a big problem&#8230; people should be RT that stuff anyway for context.<br />
.<br />
Re Point 3 I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s wrong or not to be concerned about follower numbers&#8230; For someone like me it&#8217;d be kind of pathetic, but if you are doing it for non-personal reasons then I guess it&#8217;d make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeJH</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LeeJH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a comparable list here...
http://scienceblogs.com/islandofdoubt/2009/04/why_twitter_is_evil.php]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a comparable list here&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/islandofdoubt/2009/04/why_twitter_is_evil.php" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/islandofdoubt/2009/04/why_twitter_is_evil.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apelad</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apelad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Unless you&#039;re telling @oprah what to do.
2. I&#039;ve been twittering for a couple of years and it hasn&#039;t noticeably undermined my productivity.
3. Agreed. I&#039;d like to think I twitter the same way I did when I only had a handful of followers, but I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s true. 
4. As will twitter.
5. Sometimes that&#039;s not a bad thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Unless you&#8217;re telling @oprah what to do.<br />
2. I&#8217;ve been twittering for a couple of years and it hasn&#8217;t noticeably undermined my productivity.<br />
3. Agreed. I&#8217;d like to think I twitter the same way I did when I only had a handful of followers, but I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s true.<br />
4. As will twitter.<br />
5. Sometimes that&#8217;s not a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2009/04/23/five-things-that-are-wrong-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Church]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdworld.blogs.time.com/?p=1447#comment-837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;1. It is fun to twitter @ other people, but it&#039;s only fun for you and the person you&#039;re twittering @. To all third parties, it is boring&lt;/i&gt;
You only see that if you subscribe to both parties. So it is presumed that you care.
.
&lt;i&gt;2. It adds one more link to the chain of things I do to avoid working (checking work e-mail, checking blog comments, checking home e-mail, checking Facebook, and now ... )&lt;/i&gt;
Actually, it allows you to check up on people without going to those places.
.
&lt;i&gt;3. It is wrong to be obsessed with how many (= how few) Followers you have&lt;/i&gt;
It&#039;s OK, Lev. Your follower count will be filled with spammers shortly.
.
&lt;i&gt;4. One day Tinyurl will break, then we&#039;ll all be screwed&lt;/i&gt;
True dat.
.
&lt;i&gt;5. It keeps you from blogging&lt;/i&gt;
It IS blogging. Why doe that seem to escape people who blog?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>1. It is fun to twitter @ other people, but it&#8217;s only fun for you and the person you&#8217;re twittering @. To all third parties, it is boring</i><br />
You only see that if you subscribe to both parties. So it is presumed that you care.<br />
.<br />
<i>2. It adds one more link to the chain of things I do to avoid working (checking work e-mail, checking blog comments, checking home e-mail, checking Facebook, and now &#8230; )</i><br />
Actually, it allows you to check up on people without going to those places.<br />
.<br />
<i>3. It is wrong to be obsessed with how many (= how few) Followers you have</i><br />
It&#8217;s OK, Lev. Your follower count will be filled with spammers shortly.<br />
.<br />
<i>4. One day Tinyurl will break, then we&#8217;ll all be screwed</i><br />
True dat.<br />
.<br />
<i>5. It keeps you from blogging</i><br />
It IS blogging. Why doe that seem to escape people who blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

