Titans to Clash in 3D: The Conversion Begins

Big news from Warner Bros. yesterday. Clash of the Titans, which had already been bumped back from its original release date, will now hit theaters April 2 as a full-fledged 3D experience.

This comes on the heels of the news that Warner Bros. is planning to release a whole slate of 2010 films in 3D:  From Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore (best title of a film that you’ll never pay to see)  to Guardians of Ga’Hoole and Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows, Part 1.

Even before Avatar, the push to go 3D was obvious. Higher ticket prices, a unique gimmick for the kids, and a way to draw people out of their living rooms and into the theater. But now, thanks to the unprecedented success of Avatar, studios are envisioning 3D as the cornerstone of their marketing campaigns. There are even reports that converting a 2D title into 3D costs as little as $5 million. If I ran a studio, you better believe that just about every action or family film I produced would be rolling out nationwide with a 3D premium attached.

I think something like Clash of the Titans – which we’ll be covering closer to release – could make a great 3D property. I’m assuming it’s a film that won’t take itself too seriously, will boast some spectacular effects sequences, and will focus on being the “big” sort of film that demands to be seen in the theater.

But with many other titles, conventional 3D simply doesn’t offer much – beyond obvious sight gags that don’t really impress anyone over the age of 4. Even more troublesome: The notion of “converting” films from 2D to 3D is the exact opposite of what James Cameron did with Avatar. He set out to make a 3D movie, and the production was designed around a 3D state of mind. He used it as a deliberate, artistic choice, and in the process raised the bar for all 3D ventures.

Will 3D conversions feel like a letdown in a post-Avatar world?

I feel as if we’re now at a crossroads in terms of 3D blockbusters. Will more tent pole films adopt a 3D production mindset, or will it merely be more of the same, converting a 2D project into a 3D print? Given all that’s happened recently with the Spider-Man franchise, it would seem that studios want filmmakers to start thinking of 3D as a source of creative inspiration, rather than simply an afterthought. But even if they started now, we won’t see such films until 2011 or 2012.

For 2010, 3D conversion is the name of the game. For better or worse.

Related Topics: 2d conversions, 3D, clash of the titans, harry potter, movies, Gaming & Culture
  • Latest on Techland

    Soulo

    Review: Soulo Converts iPad into Karaoke Machine

    Karaoke lovers typically fall into two categories: Those who enjoy it, and those whose arms have to be twisted to get up and sing in public. Enter Soulo, a software and microphone kit that can turn an iPad or other Apple device into a karaoke machine. It gives you instant karaoke in the privacy of your own home, or wherever you carry your Apple gadgets. That’s the idea, anyway.

    The Thermostat WarsSlate

    Robert Galbraith / REUTERS

    FBI File on Steve Jobs Probed Apple Founder’s Drug Use, Character

    The FBI’s 191-page file on the late Steve Jobs — released Thursday — reveals that the feds were keenly interested in the Apple founder’s character, as well as his past drug use and criminal history.

  • charlieromeobravo

    So now the question is whether or not there are enough 3D capable screens in theaters to accommodate the coming glut of 3D movies. The next question is whether or not people will see almost anything in 3D or does it really take a BIG BIG BIG movie to get them to want to spend the extra cash. When we saw Avatar on 3D IMAX I think it cost us nearly $100 for 3 adult and 3 kids tickets, about twice what a regular movie would cost. I’d do it again for an Avatar type film but not for Cats & Dogs 2…

blog comments powered by Disqus