<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nolan Readies For Batman 3 &amp; Superman Reboot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techland.time.com/2010/02/09/nolan-readies-for-batman-3-superman-reboot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techland.time.com/2010/02/09/nolan-readies-for-batman-3-superman-reboot/</link>
	<description>News and reviews from the world of gadgets, gear, apps and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: hall442</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2010/02/09/nolan-readies-for-batman-3-superman-reboot/comment-page-1/#comment-9564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hall442]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.com/?p=14681#comment-9564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, no. No , definitely do NOT use that John Byrne garbage history. That reboot after Crisis was HORRIFIC. Anyone could kick his ass. And I&#039;m not interested in a de-powered Superman.

DC pretty much died with the original Crisis series in 1985. Stories have become progressively darker, more hopeless. I and many lost interest entirely. If I wish to be depressed, I&#039;ll watch the evening news, or read a newspaper. Comics are supposed to be an ESCAPE from this world. Not a color-filled reminder of it.

Superman Returns was not great. I did not care for Routh. *shrugs* It would take a little work, but I would frankly have rather seen Reeves elder son take on the role. Now? Give it to Welling. He does it almost second nature.

Don&#039;t turn it into another Batman Returns. I much prefer Keaton&#039;s version to Bale&#039;s. Again, TOO depressing. I am going to a movie to be uplifted and entertained. Not to be reminded what a crappy place the world is. 

Heroes should always win. Villains should always lose. Period. I&#039;m not spending my money on anything other. If more people spoke out that way, Hollywierd MIGHT start listening. Hit them in the wallet, where they hurt the most.

I can&#039;t recall one storyline in the last 25 years I would have given a plug nickel for. Not one. They&#039;re not FUN anymore. And without the fun, there&#039;s JUST no damned point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, no. No , definitely do NOT use that John Byrne garbage history. That reboot after Crisis was HORRIFIC. Anyone could kick his ass. And I&#8217;m not interested in a de-powered Superman.</p>
<p>DC pretty much died with the original Crisis series in 1985. Stories have become progressively darker, more hopeless. I and many lost interest entirely. If I wish to be depressed, I&#8217;ll watch the evening news, or read a newspaper. Comics are supposed to be an ESCAPE from this world. Not a color-filled reminder of it.</p>
<p>Superman Returns was not great. I did not care for Routh. *shrugs* It would take a little work, but I would frankly have rather seen Reeves elder son take on the role. Now? Give it to Welling. He does it almost second nature.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t turn it into another Batman Returns. I much prefer Keaton&#8217;s version to Bale&#8217;s. Again, TOO depressing. I am going to a movie to be uplifted and entertained. Not to be reminded what a crappy place the world is. </p>
<p>Heroes should always win. Villains should always lose. Period. I&#8217;m not spending my money on anything other. If more people spoke out that way, Hollywierd MIGHT start listening. Hit them in the wallet, where they hurt the most.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t recall one storyline in the last 25 years I would have given a plug nickel for. Not one. They&#8217;re not FUN anymore. And without the fun, there&#8217;s JUST no damned point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreytz</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2010/02/09/nolan-readies-for-batman-3-superman-reboot/comment-page-1/#comment-5427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffreytz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.com/?p=14681#comment-5427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sigh, mythologies (typing faster than my brain). Oh, and my two favorite Supes movies are Superman II (Superman I was OK but too corny) and the first half of Superman Returns (the second half blew and ignored everything that makes Kal El Superman, but that airplane scene kicks ass).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh, mythologies (typing faster than my brain). Oh, and my two favorite Supes movies are Superman II (Superman I was OK but too corny) and the first half of Superman Returns (the second half blew and ignored everything that makes Kal El Superman, but that airplane scene kicks ass).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreytz</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2010/02/09/nolan-readies-for-batman-3-superman-reboot/comment-page-1/#comment-5426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffreytz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.com/?p=14681#comment-5426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with all Superman movies is the writers/directors have always felt they know the story better than any of the established methologies. Want a great Superman movie? Just adapt John Byrne&#039;s &quot;Man of Steel&quot; pretty much verbatim (hell, you&#039;ve got the storyboards already) and you&#039;ll have a classic. Smallville is OK because of how it takes fun to see how established characters get incorporated into its alternate universe, but that sort of thing wouldn&#039;t fly in a true Superman movie because you need to hit the classic touchstones of the character so it has mass appeal (most people over 30 wouldn&#039;t even recognize the current DC universe - disclosure: I&#039;m 46 :) ). 

Actually the first for issues of Superman: Secret Origins have been pretty fantastic, so that would be a great adaptation as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with all Superman movies is the writers/directors have always felt they know the story better than any of the established methologies. Want a great Superman movie? Just adapt John Byrne&#8217;s &#8220;Man of Steel&#8221; pretty much verbatim (hell, you&#8217;ve got the storyboards already) and you&#8217;ll have a classic. Smallville is OK because of how it takes fun to see how established characters get incorporated into its alternate universe, but that sort of thing wouldn&#8217;t fly in a true Superman movie because you need to hit the classic touchstones of the character so it has mass appeal (most people over 30 wouldn&#8217;t even recognize the current DC universe &#8211; disclosure: I&#8217;m 46 :) ). </p>
<p>Actually the first for issues of Superman: Secret Origins have been pretty fantastic, so that would be a great adaptation as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlieromeobravo</title>
		<link>http://techland.time.com/2010/02/09/nolan-readies-for-batman-3-superman-reboot/comment-page-1/#comment-5424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charlieromeobravo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techland.com/?p=14681#comment-5424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder when the studios are going to get to the point where they literally just make variations on the same movie as their sole product.  &quot;Superman&quot; studios where they make a new Superman movie and if it&#039;s successful then they make a sequel and if it tanks they just turn out a rebooted variation.  Their TV unit would turn out Supes the new series which would run until the ratings tank, then they do it again...  

Superman has now had 5 movies and only two were arguably good (Which two?  You decide.  NERD FIGHT!).  How many times do we need to resurrect a bad idea?  Superman just isn&#039;t that interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when the studios are going to get to the point where they literally just make variations on the same movie as their sole product.  &#8220;Superman&#8221; studios where they make a new Superman movie and if it&#8217;s successful then they make a sequel and if it tanks they just turn out a rebooted variation.  Their TV unit would turn out Supes the new series which would run until the ratings tank, then they do it again&#8230;  </p>
<p>Superman has now had 5 movies and only two were arguably good (Which two?  You decide.  NERD FIGHT!).  How many times do we need to resurrect a bad idea?  Superman just isn&#8217;t that interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

