Caprica, Part IV: The Mad Scientist Foresakes His Invention

Yep, spoilers. But not too many. Mostly analysis. And deeper rumblings.

Caprica is finally back, and after toying around – and then around some more – with the notion of a murdered Amanda Graystone, we can finally move beyond the rather pedestrian plotline of one grieving father siccing his hoodlum brother on another. Revenge is a dish best served cold – but it’s also a rather simple dish to cook. And Caprica has more interesting things brewing on the stove

The Adamas toy with killing Daniel Graystone’s wife, then decide better. The Graystones, meanwhile, go onto a late-night comedy show to begin damage control, trying to tidy up their daughter’s supposed act of terrorism so they can get on with the business of selling holobands. They, too, have a change of heart. Zoe’s avatar, trapped in the body of a robot, decides not to act like a robot any longer (cue the dance party). And at school, meanwhile, we get a sense that the calm after the storm has been shattered. A bomb blew up on a train and everything cooled down, but now there are bombs in students’ lockers.

(Oh, and almost forgot: Polygamist pseudo-orgy scene. Nice touch, that one)

There’s a lot to process from this week’s Caprica, but here are my six preliminary thoughts (see our previous episode recaps here, as well as our complete Caprica coverage):

1. The acting here is just world class. When I look at all of these characters hitting an emotional wall, I marvel at how these actors are able to nail their conflicted positions so delicately and perfectly. There’s Eric Stoltz, as Daniel, grasping for words live on TV. There’s Paula Malcomson as his wife, fearlessly expressing the thoughts that reside in her heart. My heart leapt into my throat as I watched Esai Morales in those final scenes. He has a full-blown meltdown in front of his brother, simultaneously obsessed with revenge yet terrified by his own capacity to hate. And, hell, even Patton Oswalt is sprinting at full speed as the talk show host; he plays a convincing caricature of Jon Stewart, who begins as an adversarial interviewer and then slowly sees the Graystones as real people, caught in the eye of an emotional hurricane. On live TV.

2. The Zoe dance sequence seriously messed with my head. It was at once bizarre, overlong and yet transfixing. I kept looking at the scene in a different way, at first ambivalent about a dancing robot, then happy that a girl can once again have her moment to goof off and act her age, and then intrigued by the way in which this computer programmer is beginning to recognize an independent spirit in this hulk of titanium. This isn’t just a work project any more, and I think this dude senses something’s up.

3. Is the non-assassination scene a cop-out or a shrewd plot device? The key scene of the show – what happens between the Adama brother and Amanda Graystone – all plays out behind the curtains. Why did the show’s creators do it this way (read our full interview with the creators of Caprica)? Should we feel robbed of a key climax, or did something happen between the two that will come back to play a key role in the series later?

Seriously: Did anyone else find it odd that she does not even mention the creepy cab ride home to her husband?

4-6: I’m all about the Graystone/Baxter Sarno interview, which was just great television (both fictional TV in the Caprica universe, and must-see TV in my Brooklyn living room):

- I thought this was a brilliant way of pulling back the curtain and revealing the larger cultural fears that are swirling around Caprica about the technology that Graystone has created. Thus far, the story has been so insular that I don’t feel like we’ve fully registered the controversial nature of Graystone’s empire, and how a good many people view his virtual avatar space as a realm where bad things happen. This is yet another interesting moral debate to inject into the show, and the hostility between Graystone and that television audience was palpable.

- As the interview goes on, clearly the host’s bias against this hologram culture lodges itself firmly in Graystone’s mind. And as Graystone starts to explore this thesis, “thinking out loud” as Oswalt’s character encourages, Caprica goes somewhere very interesting. This feels less like a scripted exchange – remember Graystone’s handlers were even coaching him on which nouns and verbs to use – than a spontaneous realization on the part of the mad scientist that maybe his invention did have something to do with the disillusionment of his daughter.

While he’s been trotted out here by his corporate team to distance his daughter from his product, it’s not as simple as that for this inventor, and father. He believed in his daughter, and her betrayal of sorts has led Graystone (note that he’s not Blackstone, or Whitestone) to question all of the moral and ethical assumptions he has long made about the technology he created. And as I’ve mentioned before, this is what Caprica does so brilliantly. In Zoe’s dancing scene, mentioned above, we’re forced to ponder the point at which the soul meets the artificial reality. And in Graystone’s TV promise to remove the profit potential from his holoband, and democratize this virtual universe, we are forced to recognize all the negative societal repercussions that accompany even the best of technological advances. Graystone is starting to first process the possible downside of his masterpiece, and you see this in all the subplots of Caprica: Technology alters everything, from love to mourning, revenge, fame, war, sex, etc. Graystone’s mea culpa of sorts was stunning…

- …and potentially devastating as a business plan. We have yet to see the full fallout of his decision to relinquish and denounce a good chunk of his company’s profits, and no doubt the economic angle of this technology tale is about to amp up. Also, just an aside: When do you think others will start to realize that Graystone’s fully functional war machine is running around his basement as a sentient being, connecting to the internet and perhaps risking national security in the process? That has to blow up at some point…

For now, I’m left with more to think about than I am after watching just about any other television show. This was riveting stuff, flimsy only in the fact that we were all but kept out of the virtual space in this episode. But judging by the preview of next week’s episode, and how the rogue avatar looks like she’s ready to get armed and dangerous as she demands answers about her creation, we’re about to spend a whole lot more time in “the game.”

How about you; thoughts about the night of Graystone’s apology?

More at Techland: Percy Jackson, and the other all-time great child superheroes

Related Topics: caprica, graystone, holoband, scientists questioning creations, tv, zoe, Gaming & Culture
  • Latest on Techland

    Sony

    How Vita-PSP Game Compatibility Works, Launch Support List Available Now

    It’s nearly time to bid farewell to Sony’s PlayStation Portable, but how does PSP emulation work on the Vita? And which PSP games is Sony making available at launch?

    The Thermostat WarsSlate

    apple-product-lineup

    Quick Cuts: Video Showcases Almost Every Apple Product in 30 Seconds

    Boing Boing’s Rob Beschizza strung together this great 30-second video of just about every one of Apple’s hardware and software designs over the years. It’s perfect for Apple fans and people with short attention sp—oh man, there’s an albino squirrel right outside my window! Every Apple Design Ever in 30 seconds [Boing Boing]

  • bignumone

    Caprica is one of the most boring, pretentious, sanctimonious, show I have ever seen. I stopped watching it after show 2 (or was it 3? I think I fell asleep).
    But I guess everybody has their own taste.

  • http://theuselessinformationfile.wordpress.com wolvenspectre

    I am only watching for the acting… the general plot is convoluted, unstable, and I think the show would be 3 times better if they nuked the pilot episode from orbit and tried to do a much less convoluted and “stylized” version of the plot.

    Too often the dialogue is painful and unrealistic until you get characters on a one on one basis, at which points the writing suddenly becomes worthy and I finally get a small glimmer of a hint of a trace of BSG quality writing and plot.

    Instead of deeply going through human issues bravely, they have taken some of the most verboten topics and issues that are just brave to take on and then treating them like they are wearing kid gloves. This only cheapens the show and the topics they take on.

    I am giveing them 2 more episodes to get their act together or I am going to stop watching it. It would be a real shame though as there is SOOOO much good talent in that show on and off the screen.

  • Steven James Snyder

    bignumone, I can definitely see that some BSG fans would find Caprica lacking in terms of action sequences. We’re not in space, and this isn’t a drama about survival. That said, I just don’t see it as boring, pretentious OR sanctimonious. There are some odd narrative elements, but that actually allows the show to build up to some rather interesting revelations about the moral and ethical implications of technology. Take away the elements of the story, and you wouldn’t be able to get to those interesting crescendos. Boring in terms of action? Maybe, but certainly not in terms of thought. And as for pretentious or sanctimonious, I just don’t see that; we keep seeing characters have their beliefs challenged and destroyed. In Friday’s episode, Graystone literally has a change of heart on live TV, realizing that he might have been wrong all along. A big part of this show is characters realizing that their assumptions are WRONG, that all that they thought they know is a lie. So I see that as the opposite of pretentious.

    Boring in terms of Star Wars/BSG/Star Trek action? Yeah. But not in terms of intellectual debates, the kind of stuff I love in Gattaca, AI and Dark City. That said, yes, we all have different tastes, and I love all of that kinetic sci-fi perfectly well too. So you and I will overlap just as much as we’ll disagree.

  • bignumone

    I agree with wolvenspectre, but I don’t like being preached to and that is what the feel of the show is doing. I was not being presented a different point of view on god, terrorism, homosexuality, death, spiritualism, and science, I was having one forced on me.
    There seems to be a lot of good talent. And truthfully the direction seems to be well done. It is the writing…oh my god the writing! Slow motion plots, riddles wrapped in enigmas, wrapped in crap, sauteed in garbage, served with a healthy side of pompousness and a scoop of paternalism for desert.
    Can you tell I hated the show?

  • Steven James Snyder

    wolvenspectre, i see all of your points. But I really think that Friday’s episode was a breakthrough of sorts. The dialogue was a whole lot less hammy. The whole TV show sequence found these characters talking like, well, real characters. And I think what we’re going to see is that there was this whole social hierarchy in place that is about to come toppling down. Graystone won’t be king of the world anymore. Adama won’t be the outsider. I think some of the formality is going to drop away, and the acting will finally meet the dialogue it deserves. (I’m so glad you like the acting, btw). And yes, I couldn’t agree more: There’s definitely a clear divide between the pilot and the series…perhaps they should have done a restart when the series started up in full.

  • Steven James Snyder

    “Slow motion plots, riddles wrapped in enigmas, wrapped in crap, sauteed in garbage, served with a healthy side of pompousness and a scoop of paternalism” Ooooh, I love it. That’s great. And I’m all about some serious hate for convoluted TV (see: Lost). That said, Friday’s episode was much different for me, and I feel like maybe they recognized some of what you’re talking about. A little less brooding in moments. A little less cryptic. A little more emotional and genuine. I feel like we’ve definitely reached a pivotal intersection here, and I’ll be interested to see where they decide to take things. ALL OF THIS being said, Thanks for actually taking part in the debate. Agree of disagree, I appreciate your time and energy!

  • bignumone

    Just got your reply, it is nice to see you pay attention to your blog. Hey, we do have something in common. I LOVED GATTACA (I hope you get the significance of that title) AND AI, AND Dark City. (BTW, now I want to see the D’s cut of Dark City).

    I agree there is good action SciFi and good “thought” SciFi. I just think Caprica is “No action tell you how to think” SciFi.

    You and I will disagree on this one (and apparently A3), but I will keep reading. Hey, at least you are eliciting a response. That should make you feel good because normally I would just stop reading a piece and move on.

  • bignumone

    Oh yeah, and I liked LOST a lot until it became obvious they were making it up as they went along. I am ashamed to say it took me WAY to long to figure that out.
    I mean, will they ever explain the smoke thing and the polar bear?
    I will say the smoke thing is probably my all time favorite “not gross” movie monster. It was really left to an individuals imagination.
    Caprica could use a little of that.

  • Steven James Snyder

    There really was a moment in LOST when we all realized: Wow, they’re just pulling this out of a hat. This is absurd….by contrast, I really think Caprica knows where it’s heading, and is hoping that viewers stick with it long enough to get to that horizon where everything starts to shake up. Who knows!!

  • bignumone

    Out of a hat…you are much kinder than me. I have been saying they were pulling from somewhere darker than that.
    But I wasn’t saying Caprica was heading in no direction, but that it would be better if they had some real interesting ideas like that. Lost left you chilled when you could hear the monster in the forest, or just catch a glimpse of it, but left you to imagine what you were looking at. Or having a camp of crazies, but they had a reason for being crazy (that I never figured out, did they ever tell us?), a reason that would have been interesting enough to follow.
    There is an art to that, and I am not certain the writers of Caprica are talented in those regards.
    There is an obvious direction to Caprica, a place it has to end up…it is a prequel after all. But I am afraid the writers are so interested in telling us how to think they will never gain ground on that goal.
    If you are right, the show will be on next year, you can tell me how wrong I am (was), and I will have to (happily) rent the first season to see where it “turned around”.
    If I am right, we will both be sad and an opportunity to do something special will whither away.

  • dmj23

    To interject both on behalf and against Caprica.

    It’s actually a really good show, the problem is that it’s 3 or 4 different shows. You have the compelling sci-fi avatar/virtual/ai dilemma, the heavy handed political intrigue with al-queda – er…soldiers of the one and then you have the mob war between upper and lower class oligarchs (greystone vs. adama).

    BSG probably had an equal number of major plot lines, but they all started in the same place and then diverged to converge later (well, specifically they all went to crazy psycho religious land). This might just be the inverse of that, they start out divergent and then converge and later find their separate way.

    Right now the problem is that the plot points have seemingly little to do with each other. They are connected circumstantially, but not in any substantial character or narrative way.

    Also – I’m started to get really annoyed at the religious dialogue. There’s some really wonderfully witty bits like when an Amanda says “we’re not company spokesmen, we’re parents” and Daniel responds “no, actually we’re not” And then there’s the whole “this group believes in some single magical arbiter of morality.”

blog comments powered by Disqus