Freeze Frame: The David Fincher Close-Up That Rewrote the Alien Franchise

Every Monday with “Freeze Frame,” we break down our very favorite sci-fi/fantasy/adventure moments – the scenes that we look forward to, that remind us why we so love this job. As you might guess, such discussions are riddled with spoilers. So consider yourself warned. (See previous Freeze Frame features here.)

I know that the term “Director’s Cut” gets a bad name around some parts. More often than not, it can actually mean “bloated” or “irrelevant” – ensuring the resurrection of some scenes and characters that were omitted from the final cut for a very good reason.

I can still remember going into a video store and renting a copy of The 40-Year-Old Virgin, dismayed to learn that this particular store had stocked only the “Director’s Cut.” There was no other option; no way to see the original. A bloated, watered-down version that was 20 minutes longer and about 20 percent less funny. I was furious.

Still, over the last few months, I’ve had numerous people advising me about director’s cuts that I just have to see. There was, of course, the director’s cut of Dark City, which reshaped the whole way I thought about the title as one of our all-time underrated sci-fi movie masterpieces. There’s the definitive director’s cut of Blade Runner, which just oozes atmosphere and architecture in a way that we’ve never seen before. There’s even The Abyss, which I haven’t gotten around to yet (one of these days I’ll finally write up my rankings of the all-time best director’s cuts). (More at Techland: Percy Jackson and the other all-time greatest sci-fi child heroes)

But last weekend, it was all about Alien 3, the David Fincher take on the sci-fi-horror franchise that was butchered and hacked down in its initial form to a final running time of 114 minutes. People love to make fun of Alien 3 just like they prefer to mock The Godfather Part III, as a work so vastly inferior to the sequels that came before that it’s worthy of derision. But the director’s cut is a full 145 minutes, and suggests a vision by Fincher that is a vast departure from Ridley Scott’s Hitchcockian suspense and James Cameron’s battlefield bravura.

In place of all that is a brooding, minimalist, cerebral prison drama about convicts abandoned at the edge of the universe, left to their own devices to find god and fight the great alien that Ripley has brought with from her escape pod. It’s a movie about ethics and morals in a groupthink scenario, about how sinners can still find a way to redeem their souls when the going gets tough….but told through a sparse, spare approach in a sprawling prison complex that feels less like an exotic futuristic destination than some sort of metallic tomb.

But I digress. The Alien 3 moment that jumped out again and gripped my attention was the sequence that originally dominated Alien 3’s marketing campaign. Sigourney Weaver’s figured out that an alien is loose in the prison, she’s been whisked away to be confined in the infirmary by the warden who thinks she’s a cook, and here the alien crashes down from the ceiling, devouring her lover and then coming face to face with her. It’s a brutal, brisk attack, the alien sniffing and eyeing Ripley up as she has an on-screen mental breakdown.

It’s a little hard to explain, but in the context of the director’s cut, this climactic confrontation – placed in the movie’s first half and happening so fast that our brains barely have time to contemplate the gravity of the situation – plays far differently. It demonstrates just how efficiently one alien can gestate, grow and overtake a facility such as this, totally isolated and cut off from the rest of humanity It allows us to see Ripley’s nightmares overtaking her reality. And in terms of the franchise’s power dynamics, it also lets the cat out the bag in a big, big way.

Think about how insidious this is. In David Fincher’s film, only a few minutes in, we see Ripley confronted by the alien that has chased her across the universe, eyed up and then spared by the alien. This is the primary dramatic thrust of the first two Alien films: Will Ripley survive? Will the aliens get to her? And Fincher barges his way in and pulls the rug right out from under us, on his way to molding a far more interesting tale of how an alien invasion among inmates can actually bring out the best of humanity.

The alien sneers, Ripley sobs, but as soon as the scene ends, this Alien films sprints into utterly foreign and captivating territory. I can’t express how stunning this is, that a director comes in and redefines all the underlying dynamics of the franchise. If you think about it, Alien 3 wasted no time in arriving at this precipice where none of the characters have anything left to lose. They are prisoners in a no-win situation, and then Ripley, who realizes she’s infected and thus untouchable, is perfectly happy to be used as bait. Collectively, the humans are now effectively the same as the alien – without any concern other than survival. The hunted become the hunters.

And it all comes back to that early face-to-face confrontation, where Ripley and an alien share a frame in broad daylight, and the whole Alien franchise spins on its axis. You might not feel the momentum shift in the hyper-edited theatrical version, but you can certainly feel the whole mold rotate in the director’s cut. This is fearless filmmaking.

Related Topics: alien 3, david fincher, fearless franchise implosion, freeze frame, movies, ripley, sigourney weaver, Gaming & Culture
  • http://www.twitter.com/leverus Lev Grossman

    The William Gibson version of Alien 3 is the only one I consider canon: http://www.awesomefilm.com/script/Alien3.txt

  • http://loonyboi.com/ loonyboi

    It’s stylish and well-shot, but Alien 3 (even the marginally more entertaining director’s cut) is still not a good movie, and a terrible follow-up to the first two.

    Now if they had made THIS version, that would have been amazing:

    I’m still waiting for that movie. It’ll never come.

  • bignumone

    Boy, you and I have REALLY different taste in movies. I thought A3 was an awful movie…not the worst I have seen…but awful, director’s cut or not. There was no saving that pig!
    Which reminds me, I have some sow’s ears around the house, would you mind making ME a few silk purses?

  • bignumone

    “In place of all that is a brooding, minimalist, cerebral prison drama about convicts abandoned at the edge of the universe, left to their own devices to find god and fight the great alien that Ripley has brought with from her escape pod.”

    I mean come on, REALLY? Did we see the same film? It was just an over-thought and over reaching sci-fi horror flick.

    Are you the same guy that LOVES Craprica?

  • Steven James Snyder

    Nice Lev, yes, quite fun; loonyboi, at least we can agree on the quality of the cinematography. The thing just looks damn good (except some moments of the alien cg)

  • Steven James Snyder

    bignumone, did you see the director’s cut of A3? I have to be honest here, and just call it as I see it: The directors cut made me think a whole lot differently about this. If the first Alien was all about the isolation of space, and Aliens was all about turning the tables and having an army of soldiers go up against an army of aliens, then the extended directors cut really immersed me in Fincher’s tone, and I started to realize this is a totally different sort of Alien movie. It’s about what happens when you have a group of humans who fully realize they are in a no-win situation. Alien 1, a crew is picked off by what they don’t understand. Alien 2, humans go up against the beast they think they can control with all the firepower in the world. Alien 3, there is not a gun to be found. What happens when you have a gang of humans – prisoners, no less – who are forced to confront the idea that death is certain? It’s more of a cerebral thing, with fewer aliens and more horrific notions of self-sacrifice. Particularly when the company starts arriving, and they realize that they need to kill this alien, or it will wind up back on Earth. This is basically Sigourney the preacher, converting a whole prison of monsters into realizing that the value of their lives pale in comparison to containing this contagion. Going back to it last weekend, I saw a different movie than I saw so many years ago….

  • crispy

    What a completely unexpected lede for a sci-fi loving website! Director’s Cut may be a bad thing for broad comedies and sex romps, but in the science fiction realm Director’s Cut is almost universally considered a good thing. The fact that you haven’t seen The Abyss may explain a lot (I’m not sure I would have admitted that). Get thee to a video store pronto!

    As for Aliens 3, I read somewhere ages ago that the original concept was supposed to be an allegory for AIDS. Before the studio got hold of it. There are still moments of brilliance, but yeh, overall not so good.

  • Steven James Snyder

    well, i’ve seen The Abyss – just not the directors cut that is like 30 minutes longer. I think i’m going to watch that this weekend.

    And I can definitely see the AIDS angle, where it’s more about how these people choose to die – the dignity with which they confront something horrific – and also about Ripley realizing she’s “infected.”

    Maybe I went into this film last weekend with such low expectations that it was easy to surprise, but I was still quite surprised by the atmosphere he created in his full cut. And that close-up early on, where he pretty much undermines all the tension of the Ripley-vs-Alien dynamic, is still pretty brave. That’s why I chose it for this feature…I didn’t want to say this is the best movie ever made, just that that shot was unbelievably bold.

  • crispy

    Oh, I definitely agree… even with a script that’s been raped by studio committee, Fincher is still a master at creating tension and developing a strong tone. I think I’m going to have to watch Alien 3 again. It’s been years since I’ve seen it.

    I’m a little bit obsessed with director’s cuts, so I look forward to your forthcoming column about that. Blade Runner, Brazil, The Abyss, and Aliens are the top ones that come to mind IMHO.

  • bignumone

    I thought the director’s cut of “the abyss” was pretty good. There was a lot added, and though some of it did not add to the story, the parts that did were significant. But the director’s cut seems a little preachy, I still liked it better than the theatrical version. (Which I really enjoyed).
    The D’s cut of Aliens (2) really explained a lot, adding an extra dimension that I enjoyed. Some may not care, but I like it when all the character’s relationships are fleshed out. They could have even gone further as far as I was concerned.
    The D’s cut of “The Wrath of Kahn” did this for me as well. Although I still think the new Star Trek is the best I have seen…ever…and I have seen all of it.
    Director’s cut of Dune didn’t make it any better (but the SciFi mini series was great.)
    There are others, but I can’t think of them now.
    OK, Mr. Snyder, I will admit I watched the D’s cut of A3, but I didn’t really see it. At least when I read your feelings on it. Now you have me curious to see if I missed something. I have to find it again and watch it. I just hated the film so much in the theater, when my brother brought it to the cottage I really just drank beer and had chips. Dang it, I hate it when I have to go back on a film like this.

  • spookiewriter

    I thought it was pretty gutsy to kill off the 2 characters from Aliens right off the bat. Everybody loved Hicks and Newt and to kill them was pretty grim.

    I’m interested in seeing the DC. I always thought the pacing was off in the theatrical cut.

blog comments powered by Disqus