Cryptids: The Elusive Bigfoot

Why is it so hard to find Bigfoot? We could say, “Because there’s no such thing as Bigfoot!” and call it a day but that’s not fair to Bigfoot. Give Bigfoot some credit. He’s lasted centuries without getting caught, killed, or filmed with a high definition camera on a tripod. So without getting into the real/not real debate, let’s assume Bigfoot exists and move on (either to the next post or the rest of this post, depending upon your personal disposition).

Maybe You’re In The Wrong Place

Looking purely at reported sightings, we’ll notice that most take place in states containing vast amounts of wilderness or otherwise unpopulated areas. States with over 100 “credible sightings and related reports,” according to the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, include California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Washington and California each have over 400, with Oregon coming in a distant third place with 223. Zero sightings in Hawaii, by the way.

I live in Massachusetts, a state with 15 sightings. Odds of me seeing Bigfoot here are not good. Not good at all. I grew up in Minnesota, which has 45 sightings. Again, not good. I went to college in Washington and, for the purposes of this article, probably should have stayed out there since it’s statistically the state with the best chance of seeing Bigfoot.

But those are just numbers. Who knows how many sightings go unreported each year? So while you may be in the wrong place, let’s not put too much emphasis on reported sightings.

Consider The Possibility That Humans Are Scary

Why in the world would Bigfoot want anything to do with us? What’s so great about humans from an animal’s perspective? When humans and animals intersect in heavily wooded areas, it almost invariably ends up with some sort of projectile being launched toward the animal–usually a bullet or an arrow.

We’ll discuss the relative intelligence of Bigfoot in the next section, but assuming that Bigfoot is at least as intelligent as some sort of primate, it stands to reason that if a primate’s basic understanding of humans is that they make animals stop living, the primate will stay away from humans.

And even without a basic understanding of humans or what humans represent, most animals probably understand humans aren’t a part of normal, everyday animal life. So when an animal senses a human (which most animals can do from pretty far away), it generally goes in the other direction. There’s a reason even the best deer hunters sometimes come back from a day of hunting without shooting a single deer.

Related Topics: bigfoot, cryptids, cryptozoology, Misc
  • thebonafortuna

    I love it. So the argument for Bigfoot existing, yet eluding us, is that he’s telepathic – but he still looks like a big ape-man-thing. I humbly submit Bigfoot is the product of a love-union between Deanna Troi and Worf. He somehow came back to earth in Star Trek IV when Kirk was looking for whales and has been making his way across the lower 48 ever since.

    I’m not sure how to explain the “clicking sounds and noises”, though. That’s the one part the author obviously got wrong. Everything else sounds plausible. Someone get the Mythbusters so they can stamp approval on this baby.

  • tereglith

    I don’t think that Bigfoot would even need to have ESP to explain all this. It’s sort of like the Florida Panther – there are many sightings each year, yet, living in Florida, I’ve never seen one. there just has to be a relatively small population of creatures that are hungry for human food in a remote area to explain sighting patterns like that. And, of course, the habeas corpus argument can always be refuted by positing that the Bigfoots are emotional enough to bury their dead.

    Also, the sightings you site occuring in Florida are probably of the Skunk-Ape rather than an actual Bigfoot. The Skunk-Apes are more primitive and Orangutanish, and much less ursine in appearance than Bigfoot, and as such are usually considered a different sort of cryptid.

    If this is going to become a semi-regular feature, then coolio. I want Nessie next. (As you may have guessed, I’m something of an armchair cryptozoologist)

  • http://twitter.com/thepeterha Peter Ha

    You so crazy.

  • http://mkgoods.wordpress.com mkgoods

    Ok, lets say Bigfoot is telepathic and great at eluding humans. But the Big Foot species (would we call them Big Feet?) certainly die. Why are their no bones? No trace, no skulls, nothing?

  • pparenteau

    The telepathic sense seem to be far fetched to me. No offense. If ESP was part of their everyday life we would never see them unless they allow it.
    What if they simply have an extremely sensitive sense of smell or hearing? That could explain the rarity of sightings. With the obligation of being downwind to some creature the chances of surprises are remote. Those encounters can be reduced to a small amount of sighting if the creature is moderatly intelligent and knows how and when to hide. The lack of bones could be explained by ritual cannibalism with burial of the remains. I am just throwing ideas here since I am not an expert in anthropology. If there is more discussions about Nessie I am up for it. Cryptozoology is a hobby of mine. With Bigfoots sigthings accumulated over the last hundred years and Nessie over an even longer period (800 years I believe, gotta check) It really begs the question, how many are required to maintain a healthy species over a long enough period of time without becoming an every day sight?

  • http://timejinx.wordpress.com timejinx

    bigfoots too smart for us now?

  • baronvonschmidt

    mkgoods – re: your question as to why we have not found any bigfoot(feet) bones…..

    There is a very simple and logical answer. It is because there has only been ONE “Bigfoot” and he has been alive over 5000 years. Bigfoot is Cain. The very same Cain from the bible who kills his brother Abel and becomes the first murderer in history. God said that no one would kill Cain and put a mark upon him.

    Genesis 4:15
    And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

    We know the people prior the flood were much larger than people are now and it seems very reasonable that making Cain incredibly hairy would be a mark that would identify Cain immediately (even from a distance) so that no man would kill him.

    His punishment was for the earth to no longer be able to be gardened by him for food and that he was to be a vagabond and wanderer forever.

    12When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.

    THIS is why people have ONLY seen ONE “bigfoot” instead of two, a family group or “bigfoot children”. This is why there have never been bones found. And this is why there have been sightings all over the earth (except for Hawaii it seems ;-) )

    Now some may mock this “theory” but tell me, do you have anything else that can answer the questions above that makes more sense?

    Baron von Schmidt

  • olij80

    If people really wanted to catch a glimpse of Bigfoot, they should buy a bunch of those candid cameras that deer hunters buy to track deer. It takes a picture of whatever walks by the camera, day or night. Just place them in the areas that have had the most sightings … just a though …

  • http://thebusmeister.wordpress.com dcarlino11

    Bigfoot is blurry, and that’s extra scary to me. There’s a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he’s fuzzy, get out of here.

    -Mitch, the late great, Hedberg

blog comments powered by Disqus