iPad Review Roundup

Like clockwork, the iPad reviews are starting to pour in and the general consensus is positive. Before we get to them, I’ve listed a few notable tidbits from each review.

• Looks as though Apple plans to have at least 1,000 iPad apps at launch
• 60,000 iBooks at launch
• Marvel Comics app “closely replicates printed comics.”
• Some video controls aren’t readily available
• Direct sunlight is a buzzkill
• Keyboard is “barely usable” at a 90-degree angle
• The A4 chip is blazing fast
• Battery life ranged from just over 9 hours to well over 12 hours
Winnie the Pooh iBook bundled with every iPad

(More on Techland: Hands-on with the Apple iPad)

Walt Mossberg from the WSJ:

I did run into some other annoying limitations. For instance, the email program lacks the ability to create local folders or rules for auto-sorting messages, and it doesn’t allow group addressing. The browser lacks tabs. And the Wi-Fi-only version lacks GPS. Also, videophiles may dislike the fact that the iPad’s screen lacks wide-screen dimensions, so you either get black bars above or below wide-screen videos, or, if you choose an option to fill the screen, some of the picture may get cut off.

All in all, however, the iPad is an advance in making more-sophisticated computing possible via a simple touch interface on a slender, light device. Only time will tell if it’s a real challenger to the laptop and netbook.

David Pogue from the NYT:

If you’ve already got a laptop and a smartphone, who’s going to carry around a third machine?

The Apple iPad is basically a gigantic iPod Touch.

Ed Baig from USA Today:

Apple has pretty much nailed it with this first iPad, though there’s certainly room for improvement. Nearly three years after making a splash with the iPhone, Apple has delivered another impressive product that largely lives up to the hype.

Tim Gideon from PC Mag:

Is the iPad a perfect product? No. And the omissions will give the anti-Apple crowd plenty of ammo. Why do I need this extra device that’s not a full-fledged laptop? Where’s the camera? What about Flash? Um, how about multitasking? These are all valid complaints, but one thing I can say about most Apple products, and certainly the iPad: There may be things it doesn’t do, but what it does do, it does remarkably well. Aside from the aforementioned limitations, there isn’t a lot else to gripe about. And to my great surprise, you can actually get real work done with the iPad.

Bob LeVitus from The Houston Chronicle:

Finally, I wanted to test the iPad’s claim of “up to 10 hours of battery life,” but was unable to monitor its use for 10 hours because my wife Lisa kept grabbing it and running into another room.

Speaking of my wife, prior to our iPad’s arrival she said she didn’t understand why anyone would want or need an iPad. Now she just keeps saying, “No, you can’t have it back.”

And now we have an unboxing video from Andy Ihnatko of the Chicago Sun-Times (Hint: It’s not that great):

Boing Boing‘s Xeni Jardin also has an iPad:

The on-screen QWERTY keyboard is more finger-sized than iPhone (obviously, the screen’s larger when either in portrait or landscape) but I didn’t find myself using the device for lots of text input (email, blog post composing) without the aid of the keyboard dock— pretty much exactly like the standard Mac keyboard. No, there’s no camera, but it doesn’t seem like as much of a big deal as when I heard that news back at the January unveiling. iPad is more about experiencing media, and light sharing, than heavy-duty media production.

That said, I can imagine traveling with iPad instead of a netbook, with that keyboard dock in tow if I really need to do heavy text input.

Maybe the most exciting thing about iPad is the apps that aren’t here yet. The book-film-game hybrid someone will bust out in a year, redefining the experience of each, and suggesting some new nouns and verbs in the process. Or an augmented reality lens from NASA that lets you hold the thing up to the sky and pinpoint where the ISS is, next to what constellation, read the names and see the faces of the crew members, check how those fuel cells are holding up.

I like it a lot. But it’s the things I never knew it made possible — to be revealed or not in the coming months — that will determine whether I love it.

Related Topics: ipad, reviews, Apple, Computers, Gadgets, Reviews
  • dennitzio

    Not sure I love how you cherry-picked the reviews to make it seem like the reviewers were either for or against the iPad, presumably so that you could seem fair in overall positive/negative distribution. But each review had a lot of positives and negatives, and both Mossberg’s and Pogue’s were a lot more positive overall than what you presented. (I, of course, have no idea whether the iPad is any good overall, though I will claim a bias towards the design mentality that Apple generally subscribes to.)

  • http://www.twitter.com/leverus Lev Grossman
  • http://twitter.com/thepeterha Peter Ha

    The reviews were positive (there’s a reason for that) and I “cherry-picked” a list of items that did counter the positivity because they were things that needed to be pointed out. People are going to want to know how it performs under direct sunlight. Typing on a such a device is a sort of big deal. I’m not sure what the problem is with what I picked.

  • dennitzio

    Lev: Nice writeup. But this sentence really got me: “If I have a beef with the iPad, it’s that while it’s a lovely device for consuming content, it doesn’t do much to facilitate its creation.”

    Just yesterday I got home from a long day of sitting at a computer in a VFX factory and looked at the TV like it was a savior. Four episodes of House to catch up on, a nice evening. Then I flashed on a 4th grade ecology lesson: life is made of producers, consumers, and decomposers. I realized I was spending way too much of MY life as a consumer, and that even my FX work is only “producing” one leaf on a huge tree (and as for decomposers, I can’t write music, bah dum bum). I’ll be damned if I go down as a “consumer”. Tired as I was, I spent the rest of the evening writing.

    All that to say that as much as I live on a Mac, I probably won’t be getting an iPad. It’s the ultimate “consumer” device.

    (Oh, and Peter – you didn’t talk about why you chose those excerpts, which says to me you intend them to be indicative of the writer, not of your own agenda. If I misinterpreted, then I apologize)

  • jstaggie

    I find the assertion that the iPad is consuming content rather than the creation of content does not hold water.

    Right now, I have an iPhone. And I create content. I use an Expense App to track my expenses when I travel so that I can email to my PC as a CSV file and my Expense report for the trip is done.
    I’ve used the Brushes app–now I’m not great with it, but it’s generated multiple covers for the New Yorker and a recurring column.

    Those and other IPhione apps plus many more iPad apps to come will support content creation.

    For me, it solves a problem. I have both a PC Laptop and a MacBook Pro and I travel a lot on business. I need the company laptop for that. I’d prefer to keep my personal work on another system, but don;t want to lug two laptops.
    –When I look at my use, I suspect I would be better served by a Mac Mini and an iPad than mu current MacBook Pro. I’m not saying that’s true generally, but it appears true to me. If I’m traveling for non-work reasons, the iPad will meed my needs–I really don’t need a personal laptop or the extra weight.
    –Even now, I browse a huge amount of content on my iPhone because it’s browser is great. And I read books on it, and I watch movies on it (especially when flying). All those thinks, I think, will be nicer on the iPad.

  • bignumone

    No problems with the reviews you picked. I agree with you, address the positive and negative about the darn thing.
    You are not hired to advertise for Apple, why would anyone expect you would not show all aspects of the technology.
    Personally, I think it is a neat little toy, and if they put a little more memory in it (or even a compact flash slot), a GPS chip, and dropped the price slightly, I could justify buying one.
    Actually, an iPod touch with that in it would be just about as good. But being able to use it on long trips to play movies for my daughter for long trips, GPS to check where I am going, WiFi to see news and attractions when I am there, apps for games, e-reader for when I feel like a book, MP3 player for in the car (audio books or music), internet for when I am watching my evening news, and maybe even some productivity apps…….see, I am selling myself and I had vowed to wait for 2G. (GPS and memory slot would seal the deal right now, though).

blog comments powered by Disqus