Gizmodo Editor’s House Raided By Police Over iPhone 4 Fiasco

The question of whether or not Gawker Media’s $5,000 purchase of a misplaced next-generation iPhone would result in legal backlash has been answered by a recent police raid on Gizmodo editor Jason Chen’s California home.

The search warrant cited probable cause to search for property that “was used as the means of committing a felony” and “tends to show that a felony has been committed or that a particular person has committed a felony.”

Several items were removed from Chen’s home ranging from business cards to cameras to multiple computers and even a current generation iPhone. Gawker’s lawyers have asked for the prompt return of all items, citing a section of the California penal code stating that journalists are to be protected from “refusing to disclose any unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving or processing of information for communication to the public.”

The letter from Gawker also points out that the search was not to be conducted at night, yet Chen returned home at 9:45 to find police already in his home. According to Chen, police broke open his front door but didn’t appear to damage anything else. They told him that repairs to the door would be reimbursed and that he wasn’t under arrest.

It seems likely to me that police are looking for information about the person who took the phone from the bar and sold it to Gizmodo. It’s doubtful that Gizmodo, Gawker, or Chen would have volunteered that information to police. Still, the home search was probably a bit unsettling for Chen and his wife.

Chen is a full time employee of Gawker Media and, as such, has Gawker’s legal team to help him out. Plenty of other online journalists, bloggers, or whatever you want to call us work as self-employed contractors, though, which would make a situation like this pretty nauseating. That, and you can’t get much contract work done when all your electronics gear has been removed from your house while you’re out to dinner one night.

I’m no legal expert, obviously. Anyone out there with the appropriate credentials care to weigh in on this situation? All the documentation can be found here on Gizmodo’s site.

Related Topics: gizmodo, iphone, iphone 4, legal, police, Apple, Gadgets, News, Smartphones
  • Rorschach

    So can all the people saying how obvious it was that Apple purposefully let the phone slip kindly shut the eff up now?

  • alienorange

    I like how Gizmodo manages to find journalistic integrity in not releasing the name of the thief, but somehow lost this ethic when it came to brazenly pasting Powell’s name all over its site. We’ll see if any industry insiders ever come to Gizmodo with information on anything, ever.

  • bignumone

    Hmmm, at first I thought Apple just messed up.
    Then I thought it was a “Red-herring”, and Apple was
    Now I am starting to think there was some illegal things going on here.
    Keep in mind, Apple does not control the police. So someone else (in law enforcement) thinks the acquisition of the phone was so innocent.
    I really want to see where this goes. I don’t want anyone to “shut the eff up” because this more entertaining than any of the lame sci-fi I have seen on TV in months.

  • bignumone

    Terrible post, sorry. You can guess what I was trying to say. I am more tired than I thought.

blog comments powered by Disqus