Why LOST May Be The Last Of A Dying Breed

You Can’t Always Get What You Want
This is the real killer: Lost‘s ending is going to disappoint fans. It almost doesn’t matter how good it is – although the backlash has already started, pre-emptively, born of the disappointment from last week’s “Across The Sea” and the infodump contained therein – because whatever the finale is, whatever the final answers given (or not given) are, they’ll have to compete with each fan’s imaginary perfect ending that they’ve been cooking up in their heads for the last six years. You can see the flop sweat permeating recent interviews with Cuse and Lindelof, as they (defensively, perhaps) explain that they’ve ended the story in the best way they could, and that all the questions won’t be answered, and and and; Lost‘s finale looks set to be a re-run of last year’s Battlestar Galactica finale, which managed to disappoint hardcore fans to such an extent – even though, I maintain, it really wasn’t that bad an episode, Dean Stockwell’s accidentally-comedic exit aside (Yes, spoilers) – that the entire series somehow became devalued in retrospect.

This isn’t really anyone’s fault, aside from perhaps the fans’ – After all, it’s some kind of weird tribute to the show’s creators for coming up with something that’s inspired such passion and imagination, surely – but, nonetheless, it’s there, and it’s the biggest danger to Lost‘s reputation. Can anything really live up to the finale that everyone currently holds in their head?

(What television producers should be worried is going to happen is that, if Lost‘s finale doesn’t blow everyone’s minds with some unexpected stroke of genius that lives up to the hopes and dreams of at least the majority of people, if it doesn’t earn all the hype and supersizing of the finale (Two-and-a-half hours had really better not mean we have several hundred endings, a la the last Lord of The Rings, is all I’m saying), then fans will think “Well, Lost sucked. Just like Battlestar Galactica ended up sucking. That’s the last time I’m giving up years of my life for a show, because even the best ones end up disappointing.” Of course, then they’ll watch Fringe when it returns and get sucked in again, most likely, so maybe there’s nothing to worry about after all – at least until Fringe reaches its endgame.)

This, ultimately, is the problem with shows like Lost (or Battlestar Galactica, or, hell, even The Fugitive or anything that last a long time, has a faithful following and hinges on answering a question or questions for its entire run): That, even if a show finds enough of an audience to survive, has smart and well-crafted writing that engages and challenges that audience, and through whatever twist of fate manages to make it all the way to an intended end somewhere close to its own terms, it will still become a victim of its own success, and unable to live up the hype that has grown up around it. The biggest danger to making a show like Lost might end up being not coming up with the right story or finding the right actors and directors and timeslot or whatever, but simply that, when it comes down to the ending, it ends up feeling like too much trouble to deal with all the expectations that you end up with by accident or intent, especially when it’s so much easier and potentially more lucrative to make a sitcom starring Charlie Sheen. Maybe we should all expect less from our television, in order to make it easier to get more.

More On Techland:

LOST S06E16 E-mail Chain: Jackob

All of LOST Told In 108 Seconds

Related Topics: battlestar galactica, Damn you Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, LOST, Poor Dean Stockwell, Random Theories about television, tv, Gaming & Culture
  • captainnoble

    I would much rather show creators aimed high and missed than aimed low.

  • http://galaxyofgeeks.blogspot.com watchingpreacher

    This is sad, but true. It will be fun to see where Television in general go, especially now with the introduction over one-seasoned shows like last years HARPER’S ISLAND (CBS) and this years PERSONS UNKNOWN (NBC). I have a feeling that FRINGE will end soon – perhaps in its fourth season (I maintain hopes that we’ll get at least two more seasons, as I am completely in love with the show now)?

    I think the future of TV is cop-shows, comedies and (hopefully) well-planned, short mystery shows. Imagine if LOST had, like, four seasons and just went really fast, knowing where they went and what they were doing? That would really be awesome.

    I think two of the questions a network should ask when picking up a show like FlashForward, LOST, FRINGE or another mystery-based show, is “How long do you think this will last?” and “How does it end?” I have a feeling TV would be better if the writers had those questions in mind when writing the PILOTS of their shows.

  • richardsrussell

    Long-form TV remains one of my favorites art forms. Look at “The Wire”, “ER”, “The Shield”, “Deadwood”, etc. Heck, look at “Smallville” (9 seasons in and still finding ways to come up with fresh plotlines). Sure, they weren’t all mysteries, but they prove that you can have intermediate resolutions while still keeping the main thread alive.

    As to what to do about actors disappearing partway thru the show, that’s a real danger, to be sure, but not insurmountable. Look at how Terry Gilliam handled the death of Heath Ledger partway thru the filming of “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus”.

    The real villains here are the network programming execs who don’t give adequate warning that the end is in sight, or who spatter a program all over their schedule, with huge gaps, episodes out of sequence, and shoddy promotion. (Yes, I’m looking at YOU, Fox, and the travesty you made of “Firefly”; and I’m still sad that “Dark Angel” got canned before wrapping up its plotline.) OTOH, props to CBS for giving “Jericho” a proper shot at finding its audience and adequate advance notice of the 2nd cancellation so they could wind up the story.

  • richardsrussell

    Geez, and how could I have neglected to mention “M*A*S*H” and “The West Wing”? Alan Alda helped make these 2 long-form shows the very best in TV history.

  • tyrantking

    I remember reading this same type of crap prior to the arrival of Lost and BSG. Then it was all about reality TV and how it was so much cheaper to make and there were too many TV options with the cable networks and blah blah blah. Well they made those two shows anyway because someone had a good idea and pitched it to the right person at the right network. It’ll happen again.

    PS the ending to BSG sucked because A) it was stupid and preachy and illogical and B) they pulled stupid stunts like with Starbuck’s return that they didn’t even bother trying to answer.

  • tereglith

    There’s a way to fix all this, called the J. K. Rowling Method of Authoring. It’s quite simple. Whenever you get really serious about a TV show idea, you figure out precisely where you one the plot to go, and then you write the LAST EPISODE FIRST, and then make it so that every intermediate episode is dedicated to building up characters and plotlines and setups that will all come to a satisfying culmination in that last episode. Harry Potter wouldn’t be such a great series if J. K. had just thrown in plots and characters willy-nilly and then struggled to gather up as many as she could catch and tie them loosely together in Deathly Hollows, and I think we can all agree that Harry Potter has fully enough material to produce at least a 7-season TV show. True, there are problems with the idea – what if it gets cancelled early? A really clever scriptwriter can probably do and outline that breaks off from the end of each season and compresses the remaining story into a single season and reaches the final episode well. The main point is that there has to just BE an outline. A mystery isn’t really a mystery if there’s no solution to it created, it’s just your old uncle Abram rambling on about pregnant superspies or people on a crazy island.

  • jeia56

    Harry Potter’s a horrible example. The ending of Deathly Hallows was terrible. I would agree that stories need some form of outline in order to be good, but writing the ending first kinda takes away a bit of the artists ability to improvise. As far as the finale of Lost is concerned, I’ll reserve my judgement until after Sunday, but I have been far from dissapointed. Sure, it couldn’t reach the astronomically high expectations that myself and others had for it, but realistically no episode of Lost was going to be able to surpass those expectations. I hate to steal other peoples words, but I think that James over at time.com put it best when he said that the only truly dissapointing finale of Lost will be one that aren’t still obsessing over 2 months from now. What made Lost what it is today was not the plot or the actors, but going on the internet in the days follow each episode and doing exactly this. Arguing, discussing, debating, theorizing, researching…etc. I really hope that Lost does not attempt to answer every episode that we can have more opportunities to continue to do this in the future.

  • http://galaxyofgeeks.blogspot.com watchingpreacher

    Jeia56, I very much agree!

  • bacchus78

    Say what you will, Lost will still be remembered as one of the greatest shows ever. They made me look forward to each new episode, and pull out hair while waiting the 6ish months between seasons. And at least it’s not any of the same tired crap that gets put on every year. I’m honestly sick of the big 4 concepts for TV which are: shows about doctors, shows about lawyers, shows about cops, and (by far worst of all) reality TV in all it’s horrible forms (except Food Network, gotta love Food Network).

    Viva Lost, and bring on the finale!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus