Why Would Apple Open Up Its ‘FaceTime’ Video Standard?

Apple announced a feature called “FaceTime” today, which leverages your iPhone 4’s front- and rear-facing video camera to initiate video chatting sessions with other iPhone 4 owners right from within your contacts list or even while in the middle of a voice call.

It promises to be “perfectly seamless” which makes sense given it’s an Apple product and the demo looks pretty impressive for sure, but what’s more interesting about FaceTime is that during the WWDC keynote today, Apple CEO Steve Jobs remarked that “tens of millions of FaceTime devices will be shipped in 2010” and then went on to say that Apple wants FaceTime to become an open industry standard.

FaceTime leverages H.264 video compression, which is commonly used for YouTube videos and, you guessed it, iTunes videos. And while Google owns YouTube, the search engine giant recently announced that it’d be adopting its own web video standard called WebM–a move that many saw as a direct shot across Apple’s bow since Apple’s already heavily invested in H.264.

So is the opening up of the FaceTime standard a pre-emptive strike by Apple to speed up the adoption of H.264 video before WebM has a chance to gain traction? Seems a bit odd that the company would want to share “perfectly seamless” video chatting technology with potential competitors unless there’s a much bigger picture at play here—namely that Apple’s sunk big bucks into H.264 and it’s got all of its iTunes videos encoded into H.264 already.

More on Techland:

Hands-on with the iPhone 4

iPhone 4: The Specs Sheet

WWDC 2010 Keynote Liveblog

Related Topics: facetime, iphone, iphone 4, video calling, video chatting, videoconferencing, web videos, Apple, Gadgets, Google, Smartphones
  • Latest on Techland

    apple-product-lineup

    Quick Cuts: Video Showcases Almost Every Apple Product in 30 Seconds

    Boing Boing’s Rob Beschizza strung together this great 30-second video of just about every one of Apple’s hardware and software designs over the years. It’s perfect for Apple fans and people with short attention sp—oh man, there’s an albino squirrel right outside my window! Every Apple Design Ever in 30 seconds [Boing Boing]

    The Thermostat WarsSlate

    google-motorola

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets.

  • gum0nshoe

    Apple is protecting its markets and pandering for PR as usual.

  • http://crichton007.wordpress.com crichton007

    They’re going to open this up so that other devices will be able to do video chat with it. If I remember correctly this currently only makes video calls to other iPhone 4s. That’s pretty limited. I’m surprised they didn’t announce compatibility with iChat.

  • mrrtmrrt

    Wow, you guys who always assume the worst are depressing.

    It’s a shame you can’t even contemplate that the simplest explanation that Apple is keen for this video conferencing standard to be used by everyone is in fact the truth. Can’t you even imagime that it would be pretty handy if you could video call anyone instead of just other iPhone users and would be a vastly better way for this feature to become popular?

    Note that 67% of the video on the web is now using the H.264 format and 85-90% of video now being encoded for the web is in H.264 and *everybody* supports H.264 decoding in hardware. Google’s VP8-based WebM standard? No hardware support from anyone, potentially rife with patent problems and not as good as H.264 in quality or technical terms.

    -Mart

  • toochivalrous

    Well, everything Google has touched has turned to gold so far… it is just a matter of time and finding the right people (since they can pay them anything they want)

  • http://jayyay.wordpress.com jbciii

    I love google. I use gmail and reader everyday.
    But not everything Google touches has turned to gold.

    Buzz. Latitude. Google Video. Knol.

  • mrrtmrrt

    @toochivalrous

    What, like:

    Google Lively
    Google print Ads
    Orkut
    Google Answers
    Google Catalog Search
    Google Health
     Dodgeball 
     Jaiku

    (all failed Google products if you have to ask) 

    -Mart

  • http://macmudgeon.wordpress.com jrep

    I don’t think the encoding is such a big deal. One CODEC more or less … license fees and ego, maybe … but what really matters is the protocol for establishing the connection. That’s what will determine whether two people can vid together.

blog comments powered by Disqus