M. Night Shyamalan’s Films Are Not That Bad: It’s His Attitude That’s Annoying

Reuters

The audience had just settled into their seats at the late screening of The Kids Are All Right in New York City’s Chelsea district when the preview for the upcoming movie Devil came on. The shots of an upside down world mixed in with seemingly normal individuals peaked the curiosity of a few people. The rhythmic crunch of stale popcorn slowed down as trailer delved more into the plotline of the movie. “This looks good,” a woman mumbled to her friend.

At the crescendo of the trailer about two minutes in came a scene so shocking that it immediately elicited a loud verbal response from the audience. The words “From the mind of M. Night Shyamalan” – presented in red uppercase – appeared on the screen causing a raucous uproar.

“OH HELL NAW!” one man yelled alongside the jeers and groans of the rest of his audience.  He clearly said what most people were feeling that night.

M. Night Shyamalan has turned a laughable failure in the eyes of the critical community and a sizeable cross-section of the film going public. It’s strange that someone who people believed could have been one of the great directors could be so reviled just a little over a decade later. Yet, for all those who have cursed Devil, his movies still gross highly at the box office. His latest critical flop The Last Airbender holds the record for his second-best eight day gross at $83.1 million dollars. It has a six percent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and yet drew a mixed review from audiences, receiving a C rating from Cinescore. Though it might be barely passing, consider that The American, starring no less than George Clooney received an abysmal D-. (More on Techland: Shyamalan: Unbreakable Sequel Will Be Different Movie)

Despite the fact that critics destroy his work, a whole lot of people still are willing to pay to see his movies. So who’s right? Are his films as technically subpar as so many critics have claimed? Or is the proof in the box office? Paul Castro, a lecturer at the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television, says the real answer to the great Is Shyamalan A Shoddy Director debate may lie not in his editing or camerawork, so much as his attitude. “I really think he hurt himself,” he stated. “He has total disregard for his stories and his audiences intelligence… For an artist to have total irreverence for everyone and everything around them because they think know better is just not a good way.”

Related Topics: bad filmmakers, cocky attitude, devil, good filmmakers, m. night shyamalan, movies, Gaming & Culture
  • jeia56

    I think that Shyamalan’s problem is that he insists on writing his own films as well as directing them. He is a terrible, horrible, awful writer. His scripts are junk. His directing skills, on the other hand, are pretty good. If Shyamalan would focus on simply directing instead of trying to write as well, his films would improve.

  • spookiewriter

    We Americans tend to think that our box office is the only one in the world. Producers and directors don’t view it that way. Worldwide receipts are what matters.

    There are cultural differences too. What many Americans view as stupid, others may think are great.
    This is what keeps Boll working. His returns in the states suck but his overseas numbers are high enough to make everyone some money.

    Specific to Shyamalan, I think he decided to take the mantle of the “New Hichcock” too early. This blew his ego out of proportion. In other words, he listened to his own press. I do agree that his movies are not that bad. Avatar was a mess because he played a little too fast and loose with an existing IP but his other films aren’t that bad.

  • saseedaran

    I believe creative impulse comes from various sources. But if Night Syamalan can focus on doing more creativity in directing his films, it will have a greater impact on the audience and the film industry as well the craft itself.

  • http://crichton007.wordpress.com crichton007

    The Village was that bad. Lady In The Water was that bad. The Happening was that bad. The Last Airbender was that bad. See a pattern emerging? His attitude doesn’t help but his movies have gotten bad and I don’t think that, given his attitude, things will improve.

  • monkatron

    I thought The Village was good, and I thought Lady in the Water was great. I just don’t get the bad reaction to that one.

  • destor23

    ““If a car company year after year produces substandard cars then the public has a right to turn on that car company,” he added.”

    I just got a vision of the U.S. Treasury investing in Shymalan and trying to turn his career around.

    Oh, and “The Village” really stunk. I know tastes differ but I’m shocked that people would debate that.

  • richardsrussell

    Remember the great cartoonist Gary Larson, who did “The Far Side” for many high-quality years? He finally quit because he said he was running low on original ideas and didn’t want to become a parody of himself. That’s why we still remember him fondly.

  • toochivalrous

    @destor I liked The Village. I loved Lady in the Water as well. Even the nature one wasn’t awful, but that and Lady were both WAY too predictable (see -writing- above)

    I think the dude is an awful writer, I have to agree. Ideas can be awesome. Directing can be slightly above par. Actual scripts, fail.

  • dstorfer

    @Michelle Castillo: It’s “piqued the curiosity” not “peaked”.

  • http://kinectedgamer.wordpress.com kinectedgamer

    Okay I don’t want anybody to scoff at me, but I actually enjoy a lot of his movies, I won’t say they are amazing or that they are my favorite movies, but it’s one of those movies I can go rent and say I enjoyed watching it.

blog comments powered by Disqus