Technologizer

You Should Be Using Wolfram|Alpha

Over at TIME.com, you’ll find my new Technologizer column. It’s about Bing, Blekko, and the whole idea of competing with Google–and in it, I mention how dangerous it is for a new company to set itself up as a Google rival, or to be perceived as a Google killer. I mention Cuil, the definitive failed Google killer. But there’s another example that’s worth remembering: Wolfram|Alpha.

The service debuted last year, accompanied by a generous helping of hype and general high expectations. My friend Nova Spivack said it could be as important as Google.  Its creators did a live Webcast of its servers powering and and connecting to the Web for the first time, as if it were an Apollo launch. They released an iPhone app that cost fifty bucks and seemed startled that people thought that was a tad high (they later reduced that a more sensible $2).

But Wolfram|Alpha didn’t go on to change the world–at least not yet. In fact, it’s just not in the news very much. (More on Time.com: Google Now Gives Searchers ‘Instant Previews’)

But the thing is–it’s an extraordinary service. Many Web sites have claimed that they let you ask questions in English, but Alpha is the only one I’ve ever used that delivers. If I want to know who was president in 1843 or what percentage of 12.95 7.04 is or how much $500 is in Pesos or how many people live in Brazil or  when Danny Bonaduce was born, it’s superb. Kind of amazing, actually. Every time I use it, I wonder why it isn’t wildly popular. Maybe people are too busy using Google to look up photos of Justin Bieber or videos of piano-playing cats; Alpha can’t help them there, and doesn’t claim to be able to do so.

Part of the problem may be positioning. The site describes itself as “the world’s first and only computational knowledge engine,” which is probably clear to its creators but doesn’t do a great job of explaining it to normal folks. (Me, I think of it as the modern equivalent of an almanac, combined with a really smart calculator.) And its moniker–including the name of creator Stephen Wolfram and an unpronounceable character–is clunky. (There’s a reason why Google isn’t named Brin|Page|Google.)

You also need to use the service enough to understand what it does and doesn’t do: “Where was Lady Gaga born?” is a good Wolfram|Alpha question, but “Where does Lady Gaga live?” is not. (More on Time.com: Bing Gets Facebook Integration: Be Careful What You ‘Like’)

I think it’s worth the bother–and if you’ve never used Wolfram|Alpha, or think of it only as something that didn’t live up to initial expectations, I think you should check it out.

More on Time.com:

Happy Holidays: Google to Offer Free In Flight Wi-Fi

Google’s Innovative New Name for Ads: “Ads!”

 

Related Topics: bing, Blekko, search, Search engines, web, Wiolfram|Alpha, Google, News, Technologizer
  • richardsrussell

    I just tried “what character did laura innes play on er” and got a few lines of basic biographical info on the correct actress but not the answer I was looking for. OTOH, IMDb.com got me to Dr. Kerry Weaver with only a few clicks.

  • steveflack

    I searched for “Where was Lady Gaga born” on Wolfram|Alpha, and it spit me back tons of information on New York City. I searched for it on Google and got a bunch of biographical information on Lady Gaga. Both of them delivered the correct answer, but one is a whole lot more useful when it comes to answering my query: Google.

  • woweverynametaken

    I tried Wolfram|Alpha when it first came out and asked “how much does a penny weigh?” Despite submitting feedback, it still can’t answer the question to this day (no matter how you phrase it: “mass”, “coin specification”, etc). Google the same query, however, and you’ll find the answer right away. Wolfram|Alpha has its uses but it has a long way to go before I’d be tempted to bookmark it.

  • BomberB

    Er, at least it knows that 42 is the answer to “What is the meaning of life, the universe and everything?”

blog comments powered by Disqus