“The Wolverine” Director: Movie Nothing To Do With The X-Men Franchise

Here’s a sign that Darren Aronofsky’s The Wolverine – AKA, Fox’s second solo Wolverine movie, spinning out of the first three X-Men movies – will probably have a difficult but fascinating birthing process, even if the finished product doesn’t quite work: The director has claimed that it will have “nothing to do” with either X-Men Origins: Wolverine or any other X-Men movie.

Talking to David Poland, Aronofsky says that he feels that he’s definitely in the right place at the right time for the gig: “I definitely feel like I’m being hired because of who I am, I’m not being hired to turn into someone… I’m being hired to do what I do… I don’t know if [Fox Studios chairman Tom Rothman] definitely knows what he’s bought, but we’re definitely going to make something great, you know, but it will be very different. You know, that’s what I do.” More worryingly for studio execs, he then goes on to say

Take off the number 2 [from the title]. It has nothing to do with that. It’s a standalone piece that has nothing to do with anything in the whole franchise or that entire universe.

Now, let’s be serious for a second: How likely is it that Fox will really let this movie be entirely divorced from the entire X-Men franchise, considering how desperately the first Wolverine movie tried to work in as many easter eggs and character cameos as possible? It’s one thing to want to make a good superhero franchise movie that doesn’t rely on the franchise, but to declare that your movie has nothing to do with the franchise at all? That’s just asking for trouble…

More On Techland:

Aronofsky Confirmed To Direct Wolverine 2

A Brief History of Wolverine #1s

Darren Aronofsky For Wolverine 2? WTF?

Related Topics: comic books, commercial suicide, Darren Aronofsky, delusional directors, movies, the wolverine, wolverine, wolverine 2, X-Men, Gaming & Culture
  • http://crichton007.wordpress.com crichton007

    Let’s hope this doesn’t end up the same way his Robocop remake did (if Darren being Darren had anything to do with that either).

  • richardsrussell

    Is this guy on acid for ALL his movies?

  • promich

    Some really wrong headed observations in this article. It could easily be argued that the first Wolverine movie was completely divorced from the legacy of Wolverine and history of the character. Part of what made Wolverine so popular for the first 30 years was the mystery of his background. Revealing a history created by weaker contributors in recent years is quite far off about what the character is about.

    None of the previous filmmakers who have handled the character or the X-Men are anywhere near the calibre of Aronofsky. Wolverine is lucky to have him. The character finally has a chance of getting his due.

    Who wouldn’t want to feature ninjas if they’re making a Wolverine movie?!?

blog comments powered by Disqus