BioWare Dev Caught Posting Positive Dragon Age II Reviews

It looks like game developer BioWare’s been caught out posting Metacritic reviews of its own game, just-released roleplaying sequel Dragon Age II. Not only that, game publisher Electronic Arts essentially owned up to the deed, trying to write it off by telling Kotaku:

“Of course the people who make the game vote for their own game… That’s how it works in the Oscars, that’s how it works in the Grammy’s and why I’m betting that Barack Obama voted for himself in the last election.”

Of all the hypothetical responses, that one’s perhaps the least dubious (yeah, I’m surprising myself, typing that). Should publishers or developers not be allowed to vote for their own games? I’d personally rather they didn’t, because it’s one more reason not to trust the system, but is it actually unethical?

It depends what you expect from a system like Metacritic, right? Do you trust user reviews? I know you want to, but do you? Do you think developers, publishers, or others affiliated in some way with Metacritic’s rated books, films, and games have never posted to the site–and site’s like it–anonymously before? That bitter enemies (or ex-employees) don’t go after each others’ products incognito?

I suppose it calls into question the veracity of pretty much any user-ratings system. We sort of muddle along, quietly assuming the scores we’re seeing on Amazon or Lowes or Best Buy are mostly dependable, but anonymity taints the system. These aren’t your friends down the street or even the people in your neighborhood–they’re people from anywhere you’ve never met, and probably never will.

And then we get a story like this, where the interested party–the one that stands to benefit most, I mean–is caught with its hand in the voting booth. Or box. Or till. Or [insert your favorite conflict-of-interest metaphor].

I guess I’d like to think a company like BioWare (or EA) would make–as company policy–employee reviews of games verboten. It’s tough enough sorting the well-written critic reviews from the not-so-well-written ones, when all we want to know is “Is this game worth $60?”

Do we really want to have to sift through industry-endorsed “inside baseball” too?

More on TIME.com:

Who’s Right About Dragon Age II, Critics or Users?

‘Dragon Age 2′ Review: Heavyweight Champion

Interview: Felicia Day On Her New ‘Dragon Age’ Web Series

Related Topics: bioware, Dragon Age 2, electronic arts, metacritic, pc, playstation, reviews, scoring, xbox 360, Gaming & Culture
  • http://figerrific.wordpress.com/ figerrific

    I found that user ratings were skewed because I’ve noticed people rate something they really like or if they want to complain about something. Especially reviews posted before a title releases (any blockbuster platform exclusive) or reviews posted to make protest a slight (Spore), the ratings and reviews tend to be useless.
    As for the issue this article brings up, I’m not surprised, nor am I particularly dismayed. Professional reviewers often get free review copies, get sent to extravagant locations for previews and press events, and I’m to believe that’s not meant to sway reviews? Exclusive reviews somehow always seem to be beaming and positive. And even aside from that, I always wonder what that person’s particular biases are. Are they reviewing a western RPG but really love the linear style of a JRPG? Are they a single 25 year old man reviewing an Ubi game aimed at young girls? Are they reviewing an MMO but are too shy to play with other people?
    I personally just read the reviews from sources I enjoy, instead of glossing over anyone’s review hoping for some kind of succinct answer.

  • C. Arthur Young

    I understand the ethical issue in that staff of a particular developer can produce ‘artificial’ ratings by bombarding any review with positive ratings/feedback. But depending on the site (if it has loads of traffic) and the game (if it has loads of users) then like Wikipedia some kind of balance in the force can be restored – if at least with a general survey of ratings across reviewers – and the skewed or tainted source would kinda stick out.

    Otherwise, I understand EA’s stance – it’s your baby so of course you praise it. But there’s always more of us than them right?

  • doubleang

    Unless they are actively trying to rig the system by spending hours upon hours writing up reviews to completely skew the score, I dont see this as an issue at all.
    I have done the same thing in the past during similar situations. I would expect them to

blog comments powered by Disqus