Can You Hack the Times Square JumboTron via iPhone‎?

A video showing a man using his iPhone to hijack the “JumboTron” video screens in Times Square has gone viral, raking in close to a million views on YouTube since it was posted on Sunday. It has also sparked a raging debate on Twitter and blog comments: Is it real or a hoax?

“The way it works is pretty simple: plug in my transmitter into the iphone 4 and play back any video clip,” explains the text that accompanies the video posted by the mysterious BITcrash44. “The transmitter instantly sends the video signal to the video repeater and the video repeater overrides any video screen that it’s being held next to.”

(More on Time.com: See the 50 best iPhone apps)

In one scene, the man is seen emerging from a store carrying what looks like a weather balloon (Times Square really has everything) and attaching the “repeater” to it. He floats it next to a giant video screen and the live feed of CNN is suddenly replaced with his image.

Without knowing the exact details of how each of the screens work, it’s impossible to tell whether it’s real or fake, says UC San Diego Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Pamela Cosman. But she’s skeptical. The key thing to know is whether the screens are getting their video signals wirelessly or through a wired connection.

“If they get their signals wirelessly, then it might in fact be possible to send them a signal which they could display if you knew the frequency and format and so forth of their real signals,” she says, adding that it would be very complicated to do and you would have to contend with interference from the true signal.

“But if the screens are getting their signals on a wire,” Cosman says, “then transmitting wirelessly at them is not going to take them over because they wouldn’t even be equipped with a receiver.”

(More on Time.com: 20 must-have Android apps to get you started)

Even assuming the screens are getting their signals wirelessly, Cosman says that what she finds most problematic is how the transmitter is able to decipher the different frequencies and different formats of each screen.

“If one screen is wirelessly getting the signal from CBS, and another screen is wirelessly getting the signal from NBC (there may be hundreds of video broadcasters in the area) then how can the little device transmit on all those separate frequencies and different formats at the same time in order to take over any screen?” Cosman said. “That is what I see as a problem.”

It’s not looking good for the veracity of BITCrash44’s video with more and more analysts concluding it’s a fake. One thing they can all agree on, however, it’s that it’s a delightful watch.

Jerry Brito is a contributor to TIME. Find him on Twitter at @jerrybrito. You can also continue the discussion on TIME’s Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.

More on Time.com:

50 Windows Phone 7 Apps To Download

See all of TIME’s app coverage

Related Topics: hacking, iphone, jumbotron, Times Square, web, News, Smartphones
  • carboncow

    You don’t need to be a genius to know this fake. This guy clearly shows hacking many different solutions.

    This would be like saying you have one key to start any car…there is no standardized technology/protocols that would allow this.

    Even if he was the developer of the jumbotron he still wouldn’t know how to do the other screens…unless he made them too!

  • http://punkboy318.wordpress.com punkboy318

    Pamela Cosman obviously needs to retire from teaching. You can clearly tell that the video is a hoax.
    It is simple to figure out. The device that’s attached to the iPhone to transmit the video is plugged into the audio port of the device. I am not a professor, but I don’t think it is possible to output video from an audio output.

  • http://lorenzenj.wordpress.com lorenzenj

    Even better, the video from his video transmitter is sent to his video repeater via the headset jack. I am not aware of any hack that sends video out via the headset jack. :-)

    He should have at least plugged it into the dock connector.

  • http://gn7465.wordpress.com gn7465

    Of course this is fake. Video through the headphone jack? I think not.

  • http://noodle82.wordpress.com monotrophic

    It’s called hacking for a reason. Unless you know, for a fact, 100% how his device was put together, you’re just rambling like an idiot. Considering how many converters there are for headphone jacks, you’re gonna have a hard time proving that you can’t convert it to run a current of electricity the way you want. It’s electricity, and we’ve been using it for a long time now, we should be able to manipulate it better then “That’s a headphone jack, that will never work.”

  • http://ikoikotoday.wordpress.com ikoikoallday

    Even though I’m pretty sure it’s fake. The “faked” point about the “audio” or “headset” jack may not be valid because many devices these days use the headset jack as the port for USB communication to other USB devices. The jack connector for USB has 4 pins,which is all USB requires. I don’t have an iPhone, but I do have 3 different devices which use a 4-pin cable which connects into what looks like a normal headset jack. When a normal headset is plugged-in, that works normally as well, but when the 4-pin USB cable is attached, that switches to USB automatically. Just FYI folks.

  • http://endlessadventure.wordpress.com Guide

    The company behind it already has come out and said how they did it (rented the screens and played a loop on them with timing cues). Furthermore, this post fails to address the obvious issue: whether or not the iPhone is capable of transmitting video out of the headphone jack (which it isn’t, unless modified).

  • pullmylegoff

    This is why children should not be allowed to play with journalism. Even rudimentary competence would have spiked this “story” unless of course Time is being paid to help promote this viral video for advertising purposes. Don’t know what is being advertised, but obviously, video doesn’t come out of the audio port and obviously, this magic drive can’t know what the pixel dimensions are of any screen it is held next to.

  • http://crkohler.wordpress.com crkohler

    um… this is just a promo for the movie Limitless. Really Time.. you were tricked by a movie promo??? Watch this guys other video.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/BITcrash44#p/a/u/0/tKxG7wQoSt8

  • http://binarylogik.wordpress.com binarylogik

    First let me state that I do not believe this is real. This is mostly due to the size of the repeater and transmitter combination. The transmitter is fine if all encoding is done at the ‘repeater’, but I don’t really that happening on a board that small and capable of connecting to various different screens. Otherwise the encoding per screen type would have to be done on the phone, but we never see the selection of the various screen types. Perhaps there is a standard. I don’t know. Anyways the dimensions are not an issue I would be greatly surprised if the display much like a computer monitor do not dynamically adjust the resolution based on the input resolution. As far as outputting video through the audio port.. Not a problem. I am certain I could hack out a driver which encodes a video through the audio port. In headphones it would sound like garbage, but as long as the connected device understands it that is all that matters. Let me ask you this. Could you come up with a way of encoding instructions into an audio file which could be interpreted by a computer to say draw a circle? Certainly you could without too much trouble at all. So why is everyone talking about the audio port not capable of doing this? Ignorance is all that I can imagaine. The only possibility I can think of that would prohibit the use of the port is the througput capability. I don’t have the hardware specifications for the audio port on the phone, but I suspect with a good encoding scheme the port is sufficient to carry low frame rate video without a problem. This is where I would investigate further though.

  • http://endlessadventure.wordpress.com Guide

    @monotrophic and @ikoikoallday

    The issue is not the simple fact that it can output electricity, it’s that the iPhone needs to be able to output video in realtime via that port. This means that hardware necessary to convert the video to an analog signal and output it thru this port needs to be present. It was possible with the iPod Photo Color and the iPod video (5th gen), however no other iPod devices are capable of video out thru the headphone jack as far as I know.

  • http://punkboy318.wordpress.com punkboy318

    Why would someone take the time to reprogram an audio output to transmit video when you can use the 30 pin connector already provided from the device.

blog comments powered by Disqus