Microsoft Deemed More Ethical Than Google, Apple and Facebook

Microsoft is no longer an evil empire, according to a corporate ethics think-tank.

The software giant earned a spot on Ethisphere’s 2011 list of the world’s 110 most ethical companies. Apple, Google and Facebook were left off the list. Other tech companies that received plaudits include T-Mobile, Adobe, Xerox and Symantec.

Ethisphere doesn’t go into detail on why Microsoft received the high praise, and its methodology page is packed with so much business jargon that I nearly passed out trying to make sense of it.

But as Business Insider points out, Microsoft started making a “corporate citizenship” push in the early 2000s, spurred by the antitrust trials that accused Microsoft of enjoying a monopoly over American PCs. The company has since donated millions to non-profits, invested in economic development programs and improved its internal reporting processes.

Not that Microsoft’s been perfect on the ethics front lately. Last summer, the company decided to keep doing business in China and obey local censorship laws, even as Google threatened to vacate the country. (Google eventually went crawling back.)

Google probably didn’t make Ethisphere’s list because companies who’ve faced significant legal trouble in the last five years are disqualified, Business Insider notes. We can only speculate on Facebook and Apple, but Facebook is facing scrutiny over privacy concerns, and tech watchers have dubbed Apple the new Microsoft due to its reign over the budding smartphone and tablet app market.

And yet, Apple is now worth more money than Microsoft. So much for Ethisphere’s theory that it pays to be ethical.

Related Topics: Ethics, Microsoft, News
  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    Can you clarify the statement refering to Apple’s “reign over the budding smartphone and tablet app market,” for me please?
    I was under the impression that they were just building the best products, especially with the onset of the Ipad2, by being ahead of the curve technologically and with prices.
    Or is Apple pursuing certain legal and patent methods that intentionally restrict those markets?

  • RichardSRussell

    Isn’t “corporate ethics” one of the world’s most famous oxymorons, along with “jumbo shrimp”, “military intelligence”, and “Fox News”?

  • http://www.jarednewman.com Jared Newman

    @tisias

    Nope, didn’t mean to imply that Apple was somehow restricting markets through legal and patent means. (It’s involved in its share of patent lawsuits, but so is everyone.)

    My point is that Apple has created an extremely lucrative market for app developers — a recent study showed that the iOS App Store earns by far the most money of any mobile platform — and that makes the iPhone very difficult for developers to ignore. Therefore, when Apple makes a policy change, such as the recent announcement that it will take a 30 percent cut of in-app subscriptions, it creates a huge dilemma for developers who have come to rely on that market.

    More on that point here:

    http://technologizer.com/2011/02/27/mog-mulls-higher-prices-and-other-options-as-apples-subscription-rules-loom/

    Hope that answers your question.

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    ah, I see, thank you for clarifying Jared.

    I think it would be a very interesting twist if there is a backlash against the AppStore. I mean, sure, Apple is almost the be all end all in tablet, phone, and Mp3 applications, but I would not be surprised if a genius 24 year-old kid somewhere comes up with a brilliant alternative to the App Store.

    Of course, that would required the App market to spread its tentacles into many other big brands.

    A global universal market for apps that conform with various technological platforms….

    Sounds like a good college project for me =D

blog comments powered by Disqus