Calling for RIM’s Downfall? Not So Fast.

The Playbook won’t reach mainstream consumers until April 19, a solid three weeks away, but RIM’s already getting slammed for their initial foray into tablet-dom. Analysts are concerned with the company’s giddy enthusiasm over the Playbook’s launch–can the device even make a splash in an iPad-dominated world? But even if the Playbook turns out to be a dud, it doesn’t necessarily augur RIM’s demise.

In any case, RIM is so enthused about the Playbook’s potential that they released a highly optimistic earnings outlook  for 2012–predictions that appear to have backfired. Markets in both the U.S. and Canada, RIM’s homeland, saw huge selloffs late last week, dropping the stock by more than 10 percent.

Despite that selling spree, RIM co-CEO Jim Balsillie continues to proclaim the Playbook from every mountaintop. “We are extremely excited about our smartphone, tablet and platform roadmaps,” he said in a statement. And the details about the Playbook, while sketchy, are nothing to balk at–RIM’s tablet sports a processor that rivals the iPad 2, but with a more travel-friendly 7-inch form factor.

There’s no doubt we’ll need an incubation period to warm up to the Playbook once it’s in stores. And sure, some features sound a bit wonky, like the tablet’s purported ability to run Blackberry and Android apps. But in the interest of full compatibility, the non-native apps will run in virtual environments, requiring an “app player.” Analysts are worried RIM is banking too much on the cross-OS capability, leading to a nightmare for the company if the technology’s a bust.

Blackberry has long been the dominant standard in mobile email, and they practically wrote the book on smartphones, launching the first BlackBerry with calling capabilities in 2002, a full half-decade before we met the iPhone. Be that as it may, RIM needs to be careful, because the stakes are higher now. Then again, the tablet market is flourishing, and there’s always room for one more. As long as the Playbook’s potentially lofty functionality comes to fruition, RIM should emerge just fine–and who knows, perhaps even reach their profit goals.

(via ZDNet)

Subscribe to Nick Carbone on Facebook
Related Topics: blackberry, playbook, RIM, tablet, Gadgets
  • peter9477

    Holy confusion, Batman! Please re-check your sources. QNX is *native*… the PlayBook OS is QNX. The non-native stuff will be “BlackBerry OS apps” (from the smartphones) and Android apps. Native stuff will be the existing Adobe AIR (Flash), WebWorks (HTML5 etc), and the forthcoming Java and C++ apps.

    Other than that, good post.

  • Matt Peckham

    Thanks for noticing that Peter, and of course you’re exactly right. We’ve updated the post with the correct information!

  • http://someonewhocares1.wordpress.com someonewhocares1

    Okay first off, the tablet isn’t officially release yet so of course the details are still sketchy. Did we know everything about the iPad 2 before it’s release? Second, the native os on the playbook is qnx, the native sdk due out this summer is c++ which is the native language for qnx. The webworks and flash environments are out but as for a virtual machine for java and android apps- the current bb os runs all apps in a java virtual machine. Third- it’s not in your hands yet! Don’t speculate and make fun of the company and device until the final production go to market version is in your hands and you’ve used it for a full week. Hey I own an iPad and a Mac computer so I’m not a bb fan boy. As for banking on too many platforms hey that’s a good thing. Many corporate apps are written in adobe air. Many consumer apps such as games will be native c++ and flash. And lastly not everyone cares what the street says about a company in terms of numbers and stocks. If the device appeals to consumers and business then they will buy it. If it doesn’t, they don’t buy it. Simple as that.

blog comments powered by Disqus