NYT Gets 100,000 Paid Digital Subscriptions in First Three Weeks of Paywall

Here’s an encouraging sign for the New York Times: Within three weeks of its paywall being in place, the paper had more than 100,000 paid digital subscribers in place – More than a third of the way towards its own target of 300,000 subscribers within the first year of the service.

That number comes from reporting on the company’s first quarter earnings results, although the guidance adds that “[s]o soon after the launch, the Company does not yet have visibility into conversion and retention rates for these paying customers after the initial promotional period.” The number does not include print subscribers who use free digital access to the paper, nor those taking advantage of a promotion by Lincoln to receive access through the end of 2011. It does, however, include people taking advantage of a four-week trial subscription for 99 cents.

With these kinds of numbers so early – The Washington Post reportedly took more than a year to hit a similar figure for digital subscriptions – it’ll be interesting to see how the next quarter goes for the site, and whether those who took the early trial stick around in the long term.

More on Techland:

Google-Hating Newspaper Second Most Popular Online

Nook Readers Get Free Access to NYTimes.com, Too

NYT: Breaking Paywall? Fine. Using Trademark? Meet Our Lawyer

Related Topics: internet, miscellany, new york times, NYT, NYTimes.com, paywall, Gaming & Culture
  • gminnj

    I received the Lincoln promotion, and was thrilled about it. I’m hoping that when it expires some other enterprising corporate sponsor will pick up the idea and keep running with it.

    I’ll be interested to see where they are in a year, as I don’t think they will hit their target. I’m betting they’ll top out at about 150k subscribers.

  • noquarterasked

    I think they can get 300,000 at 99-cents but I don’t see how the numbers add up to anything significant. News advertising at the Times Co. dropped $14 million. $297,000 isn’t going to help them.

    At the same time, there’s evidence of a drop in page hits. The Times isn’t forthcoming with numbers on that.

    http://blog.unbiasedeye.com/2011/04/new-york-timess-99000-question.html

  • pks29733steel

    I don’t pay, nor do I have the ‘Linclon’ ‘whatever’. I just click on and read the paper!

blog comments powered by Disqus