OnLive Launches New Company to Avoid Bankruptcy

  • Share
  • Read Later
OnLive.com

Cloud gaming service OnLive is still live, but under new management, per a statement released Sunday night by company spokesperson Jane Anderson. The press release addressed last Friday’s rumors that the company went bankrupt and laid off its entire staff.

The statement clarifies that OnLive is restructuring under an “Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors” (ABC), which is similar to bankruptcy and allows troubled companies to swiftly sell their assets to another company.

MORE: Did Cloud Gaming Service OnLive Really Just Fire Its Entire Staff?

“All of OnLive, Inc.’s assets (e.g. technology, patents, trademarks, etc.) were transferred to an assignee, which then sold the assets to the new company,” according to an FAQ section accompanying the release.

In this case, the new company will have the same name, and its first investor is an affiliate of Lauder Partners, a venture capital firm that backed OnLive from the beginning.

Anderson also confirmed that OnLive laid off all of its employees, but offered nearly half of them jobs with the newly-structured company; the rest received offers to consult in return for options.

A former OnLive employee told games blog Kotaku on Aug. 18 that there were not enough paying subscribers to sustain OnLive. Only company assets — not stocks — were transferred to the new OnLive, so the staff’s stocks are worth nothing now, the staffer said.

The statement clarifies that CEO Steve Perlman is not getting stocks or compensation in this transaction, noting that “most execs are receiving reduced compensation to allow the company to hire as many employees as possible within the current budget.”

Perlman will remain CEO, said Gary Lauder, Lauder Partners head, speaking to the San Jose Mercury News‘s SiliconValley.com Monday.

Anderson added that OnLive expects its partnerships to continue, and says that its more than 2.5 million subscribers (and 1.5 million active users) shouldn’t notice “any change whatsoever” to the service.

MORE: Uh Oh: Microsoft Is Unhappy with OnLive Desktop

5 comments
jasonr64
jasonr64

I've been an onlive subscriber for 2 yrs. they've been fantastic, the stream has been perfect and I've had no issues. I don't have a gaming system as I'm a casual player, onlive was a great option for me. Low hardware overhead, large choices. The selection was fantastic in some respects but in other respects lacked some more obvious titles. Games were always more aligned with Xbox selections and nothing ps3 related. The very best thing about onlive is I can try games I normally wouldn't fork over the money for. And if I didn't end up liking them, then I wasn't out any cash. I sure do hope they figure things out. Because I will gladly continue to give them $10/mo. For the foreseeable future.

jasonr64
jasonr64

I've been an onlive subscriber for 2 yrs. they've been fantastic, the stream has been perfect and I've had no issues. I don't have a gaming system as I'm a casual player, onlive was a great option for me. Low hardware overhead, large choices. The selection was fantastic in some respects but in other respects lacked some more obvious titles. Games were always more aligned with Xbox selections and nothing ps3 related. The very best thing about onlive is I can try games I normally wouldn't fork over the money for. And if I didn't end up liking them, then I wasn't out any cash. I sure do hope they figure things out. Because I will gladly continue to give them $10/mo. For the foreseeable future.

jasonr64
jasonr64

I've been an onlive subscriber for 2 yrs. they've been fantastic, the stream has been perfect and I've had no issues. I don't have a gaming system as I'm a casual player, onlive was a great option for me. Low hardware overhead, large choices. The selection was fantastic in some respects but in other respects lacked some more obvious titles. Games were always more aligned with Xbox selections and nothing ps3 related. The very best thing about onlive is I can try games I normally wouldn't fork over the money for. And if I didn't end up liking them, then I wasn't out any cash. I sure do hope they figure things out. Because I will gladly continue to give them $10/mo. For the foreseeable future.

jasonr64
jasonr64

I've been an onlive subscriber for 2 yrs. they've been fantastic, the stream has been perfect and I've had no issues. I don't have a gaming system as I'm a casual player, onlive was a great option for me. Low hardware overhead, large choices. The selection was fantastic in some respects but in other respects lacked some more obvious titles. Games were always more aligned with Xbox selections and nothing ps3 related. The very best thing about onlive is I can try games I normally wouldn't fork over the money for. And if I didn't end up liking them, then I wasn't out any cash. I sure do hope they figure things out. Because I will gladly continue to give them $10/mo. For the foreseeable future.

Nicco Janelli
Nicco Janelli

This is really disappointing.  OnLive actually works suprisingly well, and while it won't replace a dedicated gaming machine (or computer) for me, I was very excited to try it out over my Android tablet.  I was just waiting for a reasonably priced gamepad to use.

I hope they get things sorted out.