Technologizer

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Review: The Screen Makes It the Best E-Reader Yet

  • Share
  • Read Later
Amazon

We live in the era of gadgets that want to do it all. The typical smartphone of 2012, for instance, isn’t content to just be a phone. It also wishes to be a PC, a still camera, a camcorder, a music player, a gaming console, a navigational aid, a portable TV and a videoconferencing system.   Third-party apps give it thousands of additional capabilities.

Everyone, it seems, is  trying to be a King of All Trades. With one fascinating exception: e-readers.

Back in 2007, Amazon defined the category with the original Kindle. It had a monochrome E Ink display that wasn’t of much use for anything except displaying text-centric books. But its long battery life, seamless on-device bookstore and relentless simplicity made it the first compelling digital alternative to Mr. Gutenberg’s venerable invention. More recent E Ink Kindles, as well as e-readers from Barnes & Noble, Sony, Kobo and others, are all twists on the same basic idea.

Amazon, of course, isn’t ignoring the siren song of device convergence. Its new Kindle Fire HD tablet attempts to do most of the things which Apple’s iPad does, at 40 percent of the price. But the Kindle Paperwhite shows Amazon still understands that single-purpose e-readers aren’t headed for the dustbin of gizmo history anytime soon. The company is beginning to ship this new e-reader on Monday, and loaned a unit to me for review.

(MORE: My First 21 Questions About Amazon’s New Kindle Devices)

The Paperwhite, which starts at $119, is no half-hearted sop for tablet-phobic Luddites: It’s an all-new model that’s a vast improvement on last year’s Kindle Touch. It’s also better at accomplishing its particular goals than the buggy Kindle Fire HD is at realizing its aims. For consuming text-centric books and other reading materials, it’s a joy.

Ensconced in a minimalist black case, the Paperwhite is a tad thinner, narrower and shorter than its predecessor. (I was able to stow it in my pants pocket.) It uses smartphone-style capacitive touch technology instead of the earlier model’s infrared touch; that allows Amazon to make the screen nearly flush with the bezel.

The new Kindle also eliminates some capabilities of the Kindle Touch: It’s ditched its speakers and headphone jack, which means that it can’t play digital music and Audible  audiobooks or use text-to-speech technology to narrate books in a voice that sounds like a Scandinavian cyborg. Amazon apparently concluded that people buy e-readers to, well, read.

But every change in the Kindle Paperwhite is minor compared to the  one which inspired its name: the new screen. Still based on E Ink, and still measuring 6″ diagonally, it improves the resolution and contrast and adds illumination, aiming for the most paper-like reading experience of any e-reader yet.

Now, e-readers with light-up E Ink screens are nothing new. Five months ago, Barnes & Noble, Amazon’s e-reading archrival, released the first truly pleasing one, the Nook Simple Touch with GlowLight. That model takes the already-solid Nook Simple Touch and adds LED lights along the top edge of the screen. Holding a button for two seconds switches on the lighting — making the screen perfectly readable in murky environments or a pitch-black bedroom with a snoozing significant other at your side.

The Nook with GlowLight’s light-up screen is good. But the one on the Kindle Paperwhite? It’s spectacular — the best thing to happen to e-readers since the original 2007 Kindle came along.

For one thing, it’s the first e-reader with illumination that’s designed to stay on all the time, not just when it’s absolutely necessary. It turns on every time you press the Paperwhite’s power button. In dark rooms, it makes the display readable when the previous Kindle would have suffered a blackout. But it also helps in brighter environs and even outside in direct sunlight, largely eliminating the unappetizing greyish look of E Ink.

The Nook with GlowLight’s illumination is inconsistent: You can see the LEDs shooting light down onto the display. On the Paperwhite, the LEDs sit along the bottom edge of the screen rather than the top, and do a much better job of flooding it with plentiful light. A bit of unevenness is detectable along the very bottom, but it’s usually subtle.

It’s not just the continuous, vibrant illumination which makes the Paperwhite’s screen more paperlike. The resolution is 768-by-1028, compared to 600-by-800 for previous Kindles and the Nook Simple Touch models. Amazon says it’s upped the contrast by 25%, and it’s also added hand-tweaked fonts for greater typographical sophistication and variety. Text is blacker and crisper; photos are noticeably less washed-out looking.

With so much about the Paperwhite screen representing such an advance on previous models and the competition, E Ink’s remaining downsides — it’s monochromatic and sluggish compared to an LCD, with an occasional flashing effect as you flip pages — are less bothersome than ever. It’s the first E Ink display that doesn’t feel like a mixed blessing.

If the Paperwhite’s screen were a battery hog, it might not be worth the tradeoff. But Amazon says that the Paperwhite will go for up to eight weeks if you read for a half-hour a day with the light set at 10. That’s less than half its maximum, most paper-white brightness setting, but still enough to make it legible in all sorts of lighting.

I haven’t attempted to verify that claim myself: If I did, I might not be able to complete this review until Thanksgiving. But it seems to be a significant advance on the Nook Simple Touch with GlowLight, which advertises up to a month of reading time with the light turned on, also based on a half-hour-a-day assumption. (Why both Amazon and Barnes & Noble don’t state their claimed life more directly – up to 28 hours and about 15 hours, respectively — I do not know.)

$119 gets you a Kindle Paperwhite with 2GB of storage and infinite cloud storage for e-books you buy from Amazon — enough to build a bigger library than you ever owned in dead-tree form. A $179 model includes free built-in 3G service, so you can download e-books without relying on wi-fi. But hotspots are so plentiful these days that I suspect most people will be happier purchasing the $119 version and spending the $60 they save on reading material.

Amazon is keeping a stripped-down Kindle without the lit touchscreen in the lineup at a rock-bottom $69, as well as a model with the the old screen and a physical keyboard and 3G for $139. But if your budget permits you to buy the Kindle Paperwhite, you should choose it over Amazon’s other E Ink devices.

  1. Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
7 comments
Cathie
Cathie

I wish I had the touchscreen backlit version.  I hate trying to read the non-backlit one without the touchscreen...too old fashioned and cumbersome.

Jean Dieng
Jean Dieng

http://book-on-kindle.com/In this article I am going to be discussing the Amazon Kindle and the Apple iPad 2. I shall be reviewing both products and giving you information on both so you can make an educated decision on which product will suit you be

Jean Dieng
Jean Dieng

In this article I am going to be discussing the Amazon Kindle and the Apple iPad 2. I shall be reviewing both products and giving you information on both so you can make an educated decision on which product will suit you best.

makarios
makarios

I still have my generation one Kindle. I am so satisfied with it I just can't justify getting something else. My wife even wants to buy me a new Kindle for Christmas but it's like, "You can if you want but I sure don't need it." Love Kindle.

Armin Hanik
Armin Hanik

Of course books in any other format are EASY to move. Odd that someone writing an article about it does not know the basics... or is not willing to reveal the facts.

An e-book library program like Calibre (freeware) will do it for you on the fly, you won't even notice it happening.