US & China Crack Down on Product Piracy

REUTERS

Before you try to buy that counterfeit knockoff to save some bucks, know that two of the largest governments in the world might be keeping a closer eye on eye on you. Yesterday, the US made several moves to block web sites that were known to sell counterfeit items and goods that infringed on intellectual property rights. China added that they were joining the fight by cracking down in illegal products from software to music.

The World Trade Organization has already reprimanded China for not doing enough to enforce copyrights, patents and the like within their country. This new six month campaign will not only focus on tech goods, it will also try to strengthen commerce relations with the US, Japan and Europe. Some trade groups estimate that China’s booming counterfeit economy has cost manufacturers billions of dollars a year. China has already made some concessions to try to keep false products out of their stores, like requiring PCs to come pre-installed with official software. As of last year, 98 percent of computers in China were operating with licensed software, up from 87.7 percent just three years ago, according to the National Copyright Association. However, the Business Software Alliance stays over three-fourths of software in China is copied illegally from some source. (More on Time.com: Tough New Anti-Piracy Legislation on the Way?)

Back in the US, the government shut down 82 websites that sold counterfeit goods.  The courts allowed the government to seize domain names after undercover officials bought illegal goods from these companies. No word if either country will enact harsher penalties for those caught dealing the goods or if they are going to be cracking down on people who download illegal goods for personal use, not profit.

More on TIME.com:

Digital Manga Guild Beats The Scanslators At Their Own Game?

R.I.P. Limewire, Stealing Music With You Will Be Missed

TV Networks Blocking Shows From Google TV’s Web Browser

Related Topics: china, illegal downloads, music piracy, piracy, software piracy, United States, US, Business, News
  • http://youtube.com/churchhatestucker Church

    Good gods, wake up. Seizing a domain before a trial is an infringement of free speech.

    “Counterfeit” doesn’t mean what it used to. It’s equally applied to ‘infringing’ content by people who want to conflate two disparate issues. The least you can do as a ‘journalist’ is not help them.

  • EDS

    Seizing a domain that is engaged entirely in piracy isn’t about “free speech.” It’s about theft. Raiding a warehouse full of counterfeit goods is ok, but closing down a website that makes money off the hard work of others isn’t? The internet ain’t sacred. It’s about time the law catches up with reality.

    Just like their legit brethren, the bootlegging business has gone online. We are talking about websites that profit from theft. The black market is online and it’s not surprising that the law has followed them there.

    People’s livelihoods are at stake.

  • avatar139

    @EDS – If the people who actually did the hard work were the ones actually getting paid for said works, I might agree with you more on this issue.

    As it stands now though, that’s not really the case (fyi, a good example of common industry practices here: http://goo.gl/LxfzF).

    Scummy industry practices aside, I think the bigger issue here that you’re missing is that the MPAA and RIAA (amongst others) seem to want to blur the line between products and services to the point where if I buy a physical product at the store, (like a DVD or a CD) I don’t actually own it, I’m merely licensed it from the company that made it and therefore restricted by Civil Law from doing different things with it.

    With software I can justify that by arguing that by providing free product updates, support, etc. so it’s an ongoing arrangement between me and the company that makes said software, but if I am buying a self-contained product, I don’t see why I should be bound by a licensing agreement that tries to restrict what I can and cannot do with the product that I just bought and (should) own!

  • http://youtube.com/churchhatestucker Church

    “Seizing a domain that is engaged entirely in piracy isn’t about “free speech.” It’s about theft

    Read more: http://techland.com/2010/11/30/us-china-crack-down-on-product-piracy/#ixzz16pGJ4KaA

    Yes. it’s theft of people’s ability to repeat what they’ve heard. Which is free speech, as far as I’m concerned.

  • tirrem

    Profit? How do sites like TPB profit when they rely on donations to stay up and running?

    The law isn’t following anything, and the authorities are just doing whatever they want.

    People’s livelihoods? At stake?? Because dudes in their parents’ basements don’t want to fork over $15 to sit in a crowded shit hole with a hundred other smelly, loud, inconsiderate, and such people and watch what may be the dumbest movie ever?

    The internet may not be sacred, but apparently neither is our freedom.

  • http://avatar139.wordpress.com avatar139

    @ tirrem – I agree with your sentiments, but I think it’s actually more the authorities are doing whatever the entertainment industry lobbyists tell their political lords and masters to do!

  • pks29733steel

    @EDS, so someone buys a ‘Rolex’ conterfeit from say a ‘flea Market’. ‘Rolex’ is going to miss a sale since the ‘Rolex’ market usally doesn’t shop at flea markets. Plus the ‘flea market’ crowd can’t afford a real ‘Rolex’. So the conterfeit ‘Rolex’ has no monetary harm to the company. Music, downloads are available everywhere. Why buy a ‘I-Pod’ and pay Apple money for a download that I can only play on thier device? I can grab downloads from hundred of sites ($15.99 for a cd with ONE good song on it? Lables this is why ‘Napster’ took off so quickly.) versus paying for a ‘Album’ when there is only one or two tracks that are worthwhile listening to? The world has become like the clothing market, designers comming out with a hot item and 30 million other manufactures making ‘knock offs’ that sell more than the original!! Yeah, that designer’s shirt is $75, but this other one is only $15. Might be made of cheaper materials that won’t last as long, but at $15 bucks I could buy 5 knock offs for the price of one, plus fashions change so I may only need one!

blog comments powered by Disqus